Examiner Jaime Duckworth

Grant ratio: 44.2% (41st percentile in Art Unit 2179 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.70. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2025
Grant ratio 44.2%
Average office actions / grant 3.70
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89504
Primary art unit
2179
Work group
2170
Technology center
2100
Applications
197
Granted applications
87

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 48.0% 3.02
Group 190 48.6% 2.73
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.47 697 office actions across 201 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 201 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 34 16.9%
2 OAs 50 24.9%
3 OAs 20 10.0%
4 OAs 41 20.4%
5+ OAs 56 27.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 18.2% 2013 2014: 35.3% 2014 2015: 53.3% 2015 2016: 31.6% 2016 2017: 23.8% 2017 2018: 36.4% 2018 2019: 33.3% 2019 2020: 52.4% 2020 2021: 58.3% 2021 2022: 68.8% 2022 2023: 64.3% 2023 2024: 62.5% 2024 2025: 0.0% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201311218.2%
201417635.3%
201515853.3%
201619631.6%
201721523.8%
201822836.4%
201912433.3%
2020211152.4%
202112758.3%
2022161168.8%
202314964.3%
2024161062.5%
2025100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 201 0.0% 2.5% 97.0% 0.0%
Action 2 167 0.0% 2.4% 95.2% 1.2%
Action 3 117 0.0% 1.7% 97.4% 0.9%
Action 4 97 0.0% 1.0% 94.8% 4.1%
Action 5 56 1.8% 0.0% 96.4% 1.8%
Action 6 35 0.0% 0.0% 97.1% 2.9%
Action 7 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 53 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 697 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 7, 2024 15/857,440 Affirmed §103
Feb. 27, 2023 16/836,072 Reversed §103
Jun. 9, 2022 15/336,717 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jun. 1, 2022 16/181,529 Affirmed §103
Jan. 22, 2019 13/093,036 Affirmed §103
Nov. 30, 2017 13/104,241 Affirmed §103
Sep. 15, 2017 13/106,211 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.