Examiner Danny Chan

Grant ratio: 72.7% (59th percentile in Art Unit 2186 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.06. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 72.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.06
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90197
Primary art unit
2186
Work group
2180
Technology center
2100
Applications
477
Granted applications
347
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5134
Supervisor
Kim Huynh
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4147

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 15 42.2% 2.03
Group 178 52.5% 1.89
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.07 986 office actions across 477 applications
Applications with office actions 99.0% 472 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 1.0%
1 OA 212 44.4%
2 OAs 129 27.0%
3 OAs 68 14.3%
4 OAs 32 6.7%
5+ OAs 31 6.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 76.5% 2013 2014: 93.8% 2014 2015: 71.0% 2015 2016: 76.5% 2016 2017: 77.8% 2017 2018: 80.0% 2018 2019: 81.0% 2019 2020: 64.1% 2020 2021: 90.2% 2021 2022: 84.2% 2022 2023: 81.0% 2023 2024: 87.0% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2013171376.5%
2014323093.8%
2015312271.0%
2016342676.5%
2017362877.8%
2018352880.0%
2019423481.0%
2020392564.1%
2021413790.2%
2022383284.2%
2023423481.0%
2024232087.0%
2025361850.0%
20263100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 472 0.4% 6.4% 89.2% 1.3%
Action 2 260 0.4% 3.8% 94.2% 0.8%
Action 3 131 0.0% 2.3% 93.9% 0.8%
Action 4 63 0.0% 1.6% 96.8% 0.0%
Action 5 31 0.0% 6.5% 90.3% 3.2%
Action 6 15 0.0% 0.0% 93.3% 0.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 71.4% 28.6%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 177 office actions
All years 0.3% 3 of 986 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
100.0% 1/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 1/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 17, 2021 15/387,332 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.