Examiner Atique Ahmed

Grant ratio: 69.8% (53rd percentile in Art Unit 2413 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.27. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 69.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.27
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90830
Primary art unit
2413
Work group
2410
Technology center
2400
Applications
506
Granted applications
353
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6244
Supervisor
Un Cho
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7919

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 54.4% 2.44
Group 166 51.7% 1.94
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.34 1,184 office actions across 506 applications
Applications with office actions 97.2% 492 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 14 2.8%
1 OA 175 34.6%
2 OAs 144 28.5%
3 OAs 62 12.3%
4 OAs 61 12.1%
5+ OAs 50 9.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 52.6% 2014 2015: 66.7% 2015 2016: 66.7% 2016 2017: 57.1% 2017 2018: 56.8% 2018 2019: 82.5% 2019 2020: 92.3% 2020 2021: 88.9% 2021 2022: 91.8% 2022 2023: 83.7% 2023 2024: 91.7% 2024 2025: 43.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2014191052.6%
2015211466.7%
2016271866.7%
2017281657.1%
2018442556.8%
2019574782.5%
2020524892.3%
2021363288.9%
2022494591.8%
2023433683.7%
2024484491.7%
2025411843.9%
20264100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 492 2.6% 6.9% 68.3% 8.7%
Action 2 317 1.9% 4.1% 71.9% 7.6%
Action 3 173 2.3% 1.2% 71.7% 7.5%
Action 4 111 2.7% 0.9% 71.2% 9.9%
Action 5 50 0.0% 0.0% 76.0% 6.0%
Action 6 24 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 12.5%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 58.3% 33.3%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 80.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 252 office actions
All years 2.2% 26 of 1,184 office actions
Change -1.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
6.7%
12.0%
1.9%
2.5%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.3%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
71.4% 5/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.4 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 28, 2025 16/864,888 Affirmed §103
Jan. 9, 2023 15/832,373 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §102 · §103 · §112
Mar. 30, 2021 15/298,549 Reversed §103
May. 20, 2020 14/233,170 Reversed §102 · §103
Jan. 30, 2019 14/116,030 Reversed §103
May. 2, 2018 14/229,692 Affirmed in part §103 · §120
Feb. 1, 2017 13/700,006 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.