Examiner Christopher C. Harris

Grant ratio: 65.6% (62nd percentile in Art Unit 2432 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.88. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 65.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.88
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88858
Primary art unit
2432
Work group
2490
Technology center
2400
Applications
404
Granted applications
265
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7841
Supervisor
Luu Pham
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5002

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 59.6% 1.74
Group 202 60.0% 2.06
Tech Center 1,771 57.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.95 788 office actions across 404 applications
Applications with office actions 99.3% 401 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.7%
1 OA 210 52.0%
2 OAs 95 23.5%
3 OAs 43 10.6%
4 OAs 27 6.7%
5+ OAs 26 6.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 100.0% 2009 2012: 80.0% 2012 2013: 75.0% 2013 2014: 47.6% 2014 2015: 40.0% 2015 2016: 72.7% 2016 2017: 61.8% 2017 2018: 77.8% 2018 2019: 82.4% 2019 2020: 86.7% 2020 2021: 76.9% 2021 2022: 85.7% 2022 2023: 84.6% 2023 2024: 89.3% 2024 2025: 54.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200911100.0%
20125480.0%
2013241875.0%
2014211047.6%
201515640.0%
2016332472.7%
2017342161.8%
2018453577.8%
2019342882.4%
2020302686.7%
2021262076.9%
20227685.7%
2023262284.6%
2024282589.3%
2025351954.3%
20264000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 401 3.5% 7.2% 72.8% 13.5%
Action 2 191 3.1% 3.1% 87.4% 5.2%
Action 3 96 2.1% 7.3% 85.4% 4.2%
Action 4 53 1.9% 3.8% 88.7% 3.8%
Action 5 26 3.8% 3.8% 88.5% 3.8%
Action 6 13 0.0% 0.0% 92.3% 7.7%
Action 7 4 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 4.1% 6 of 145 office actions
All years 3.2% 25 of 788 office actions
Change +1.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
12.5%
0.0%
1.3%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.6%
1.1%
5.9%
5.9%
2019: PEG
1.9%
2.1%
7.5%
0.0%
7.7%
2024: AI examples
7.0%
2025: August memo
3.8%
2.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.6 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 29, 2016 12/306,692 Granted-In-Part §103
May. 17, 2013 10/517,246 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.