Examiner Jayesh Jhaveri

Grant ratio: 79.0% (92nd percentile in Art Unit 2433 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.56. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 79.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.56
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87569
Primary art unit
2433
Work group
2430
Technology center
2400
Applications
566
Granted applications
447
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7584
Supervisor
Krista Bui
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7291

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 55.7% 2.09
Group 234 61.1% 1.99
Tech Center 1,771 57.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.59 899 office actions across 566 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 564 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.4%
1 OA 354 62.5%
2 OAs 139 24.6%
3 OAs 41 7.2%
4 OAs 18 3.2%
5+ OAs 12 2.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 100.0% 2010 2011: 41.2% 2011 2012: 75.6% 2012 2013: 82.9% 2013 2014: 68.8% 2014 2015: 78.9% 2015 2016: 84.2% 2016 2017: 85.7% 2017 2018: 91.2% 2018 2019: 84.4% 2019 2020: 93.6% 2020 2021: 86.8% 2021 2022: 94.1% 2022 2023: 78.4% 2023 2024: 84.8% 2024 2025: 61.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201011100.0%
201117741.2%
2012413175.6%
2013413482.9%
2014322268.8%
2015383078.9%
2016383284.2%
2017423685.7%
2018343191.2%
2019453884.4%
2020474493.6%
2021383386.8%
2022343294.1%
2023372978.4%
2024332884.8%
2025311961.3%
20261700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 564 0.0% 11.9% 83.5% 1.6%
Action 2 210 0.0% 8.1% 87.1% 1.9%
Action 3 71 0.0% 2.8% 91.5% 2.8%
Action 4 30 0.0% 3.3% 93.3% 3.3%
Action 5 12 0.0% 8.3% 91.7% 0.0%
Action 6 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 106 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 899 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 27, 2021 15/087,772 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jul. 28, 2016 12/729,251 Reversed §102
Jun. 3, 2016 12/049,303 Affirmed §102 · §103
Mar. 26, 2015 12/818,934 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.