Examiner Stephen Sanders

Grant ratio: 79.9% (62nd percentile in Art Unit 2434 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.06. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2018
Grant ratio 79.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.06
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85017
Primary art unit
2434
Work group
2430
Technology center
2400
Applications
323
Granted applications
258

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 33 64.9% 1.70
Group 233 61.7% 1.99
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.06 701 office actions across 340 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 340 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 161 47.4%
2 OAs 91 26.8%
3 OAs 37 10.9%
4 OAs 28 8.2%
5+ OAs 23 6.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 53.8% 2008 2009: 46.7% 2009 2010: 76.5% 2010 2011: 74.1% 2011 2012: 75.7% 2012 2013: 85.7% 2013 2014: 85.3% 2014 2015: 97.0% 2015 2016: 92.5% 2016 2017: 86.4% 2017 2018: 100.0% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200813753.8%
2009301446.7%
2010342676.5%
2011272074.1%
2012372875.7%
2013494285.7%
2014342985.3%
2015333297.0%
2016403792.5%
2017221986.4%
201844100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 340 0.3% 40.9% 46.8% 0.0%
Action 2 179 0.6% 33.5% 57.5% 0.0%
Action 3 88 0.0% 22.7% 69.3% 1.1%
Action 4 51 0.0% 23.5% 74.5% 2.0%
Action 5 23 0.0% 13.0% 82.6% 4.3%
Action 6 11 0.0% 9.1% 90.9% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 2 of 701 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
36.4% 4/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
45.5% 5/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 30, 2017 12/205,693 Reversed §103
Nov. 28, 2016 12/137,044 Affirmed §103
Jun. 29, 2016 12/968,844 Reversed §103
Sep. 28, 2015 12/287,372 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 20, 2015 12/186,198 Reversed N/A
Aug. 19, 2014 11/317,464 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 15, 2014 11/122,157 Affirmed in part N/A
Feb. 10, 2014 10/525,138 Affirmed §103
Oct. 15, 2013 11/035,635 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 12, 2013 11/396,722 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 30, 2013 11/396,848 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.