Examiner Sayed Aresh Beheshti Shirazi

Grant ratio: 73.3% (44th percentile in Art Unit 2435 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.46. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: May 2020
Grant ratio 73.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.46
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86606
Primary art unit
2435
Work group
2430
Technology center
2400
Applications
356
Granted applications
261

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 65.2% 1.67
Group 233 61.7% 1.99
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.46 895 office actions across 364 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 364 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 129 35.4%
2 OAs 106 29.1%
3 OAs 46 12.6%
4 OAs 44 12.1%
5+ OAs 39 10.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 37.5% 2009 2010: 55.6% 2010 2011: 69.0% 2011 2012: 75.8% 2012 2013: 71.1% 2013 2014: 75.0% 2014 2015: 74.3% 2015 2016: 82.9% 2016 2017: 78.8% 2017 2018: 83.3% 2018 2019: 61.9% 2019 2020: 60.0% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20098337.5%
2010181055.6%
2011292069.0%
2012332575.8%
2013382771.1%
2014483675.0%
2015352674.3%
2016413482.9%
2017332678.8%
2018423583.3%
2019211361.9%
202010660.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 364 4.1% 4.4% 88.5% 2.7%
Action 2 235 6.8% 4.3% 84.7% 2.6%
Action 3 129 3.9% 2.3% 89.1% 4.7%
Action 4 83 9.6% 1.2% 86.7% 2.4%
Action 5 39 5.1% 0.0% 92.3% 2.6%
Action 6 26 3.8% 0.0% 96.2% 0.0%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 5.3% 47 of 895 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.4%
2.6%
17.7%
22.8%
2019: PEG
8.9%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 16. Merits outcomes: 9 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
43.8% 7/16 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
43.8% 7/16 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.0 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 5, 2022 15/002,632 Affirmed §103
Apr. 1, 2022 15/413,941 Affirmed §103
Aug. 12, 2021 15/057,474 Reversed §103
Jan. 10, 2020 14/012,597 Affirmed §101
Dec. 19, 2019 14/542,481 Reversed §101 · §103
Jun. 26, 2017 13/731,645 Affirmed §101 · §103
Mar. 30, 2017 11/758,387 Reversed New ground of rejection §103
Dec. 13, 2016 13/822,239 Affirmed §103
Oct. 31, 2016 13/625,575 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 28, 2016 13/066,840 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jan. 29, 2016 12/816,966 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 17, 2015 11/851,045 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.