Examiner Courtney Fields

Grant ratio: 79.7% (66th percentile in Art Unit 2436 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.08. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 79.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.08
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79774
Primary art unit
2436
Work group
2430
Technology center
2400
Applications
690
Granted applications
550
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3871
Supervisor
Shewaye Gelagay
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4219

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 61.4% 2.11
Group 233 61.7% 1.99
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.10 1,450 office actions across 690 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 690 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 251 36.4%
2 OAs 260 37.7%
3 OAs 96 13.9%
4 OAs 45 6.5%
5+ OAs 38 5.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 75.9% 2008 2009: 76.7% 2009 2010: 81.0% 2010 2011: 84.2% 2011 2012: 84.1% 2012 2013: 88.9% 2013 2014: 90.6% 2014 2015: 76.5% 2015 2016: 94.4% 2016 2017: 75.9% 2017 2018: 74.2% 2018 2019: 96.6% 2019 2020: 85.7% 2020 2021: 88.0% 2021 2022: 95.0% 2022 2023: 94.7% 2023 2024: 75.9% 2024 2025: 48.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008544175.9%
2009433376.7%
2010423481.0%
2011574884.2%
2012443784.1%
2013454088.9%
2014534890.6%
2015342676.5%
2016363494.4%
2017292275.9%
2018312374.2%
2019292896.6%
2020282485.7%
2021252288.0%
2022201995.0%
2023383694.7%
2024292275.9%
2025271348.1%
20262600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 690 1.2% 39.6% 55.2% 1.6%
Action 2 439 1.1% 21.0% 73.8% 2.5%
Action 3 179 3.9% 17.9% 70.4% 6.1%
Action 4 83 3.6% 12.0% 83.1% 1.2%
Action 5 38 2.6% 10.5% 78.9% 5.3%
Action 6 15 0.0% 13.3% 86.7% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.7% 1 of 153 office actions
All years 1.7% 24 of 1,450 office actions
Change -1.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.9%
1.0%
5.8%
0.8%
1.0%
1.6%
2014: Alice
3.1%
3.2%
2.8%
1.4%
1.4%
2019: PEG
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.1%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 27, 2025 17/159,346 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 31, 2023 15/582,383 Reversed §103
Jan. 27, 2022 15/053,899 Reversed §103
Jun. 6, 2017 13/196,781 Affirmed §103
Jan. 22, 2016 12/869,622 Affirmed N/A
May. 6, 2015 12/861,807 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 20, 2015 12/123,084 Affirmed §102
Oct. 24, 2012 10/957,490 Reversed N/A
Jun. 2, 2011 10/934,186 Affirmed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.