Examiner Tamara Teslovich

Grant ratio: 55.9% (48th percentile in Art Unit 2453 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.01. Most common rejection type: §102.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: March 2026
Grant ratio 55.9%
Average office actions / grant 3.01
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80584
Primary art unit
2453
Work group
2450
Technology center
2400
Applications
261
Granted applications
146

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 56.6% 2.90
Group 210 57.4% 2.41
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.75 762 office actions across 277 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 277 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 72 26.0%
2 OAs 83 30.0%
3 OAs 51 18.4%
4 OAs 30 10.8%
5+ OAs 41 14.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 8.3% 2008 2009: 41.4% 2009 2010: 48.0% 2010 2011: 59.1% 2011 2012: 58.3% 2012 2013: 72.7% 2013 2014: 63.2% 2014 2015: 57.1% 2015 2016: 50.0% 2016 2017: 50.0% 2017 2018: 56.3% 2018 2019: 83.3% 2019 2021: 80.0% 2021 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20081218.3%
2009291241.4%
2010251248.0%
2011442659.1%
2012241458.3%
2013221672.7%
2014191263.2%
201514857.1%
201610550.0%
201716850.0%
201816956.3%
2019181583.3%
202110880.0%
2026200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 277 2.9% 60.6% 33.2% 1.8%
Action 2 205 2.0% 53.7% 43.4% 0.0%
Action 3 122 1.6% 44.3% 50.8% 0.8%
Action 4 71 1.4% 35.2% 59.2% 4.2%
Action 5 41 7.3% 39.0% 53.7% 0.0%
Action 6 24 12.5% 50.0% 37.5% 0.0%
Action 7 10 10.0% 50.0% 40.0% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 4 office actions
All years 2.9% 22 of 762 office actions
Change -2.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.4%
2.2%
1.2%
1.0%
1.2%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
7.1%
17.0%
7.0%
2019: PEG
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
22.2% 2/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
22.2% 2/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 19, 2017 12/969,014 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Jun. 21, 2016 11/583,272 Affirmed §103
May. 22, 2015 10/345,075 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 29, 2015 12/361,279 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 2, 2015 12/205,685 Reversed N/A
Jun. 18, 2014 11/317,486 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 18, 2013 12/055,204 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 26, 2013 10/206,681 Reversed N/A
Apr. 25, 2013 10/927,031 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.