Examiner Brian O Connor

Grant ratio: 77.6% (83rd percentile in Art Unit 2465 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.02. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 77.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.02
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82140
Primary art unit
2465
Work group
2460
Technology center
2400
Applications
932
Granted applications
723
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1081
Supervisor
Gary Mui
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1420

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 47.6% 1.96
Group 225 60.1% 2.07
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.00 1,860 office actions across 932 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 930 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.2%
1 OA 505 54.2%
2 OAs 217 23.3%
3 OAs 88 9.4%
4 OAs 48 5.2%
5+ OAs 72 7.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 50.0% 2008 2009: 36.8% 2009 2010: 52.2% 2010 2011: 66.7% 2011 2012: 83.7% 2012 2013: 84.1% 2013 2014: 79.4% 2014 2015: 80.3% 2015 2016: 90.9% 2016 2017: 88.9% 2017 2018: 92.3% 2018 2019: 93.7% 2019 2020: 85.7% 2020 2021: 94.5% 2021 2022: 93.3% 2022 2023: 97.9% 2023 2024: 98.1% 2024 2025: 34.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008221150.0%
200919736.8%
2010231252.2%
2011422866.7%
2012494183.7%
2013635384.1%
2014635079.4%
2015614980.3%
2016555090.9%
2017635688.9%
2018524892.3%
2019635993.7%
2020564885.7%
2021555294.5%
2022454293.3%
2023484797.9%
2024535298.1%
2025521834.6%
20264800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 930 2.2% 39.2% 49.0% 1.4%
Action 2 425 1.2% 14.4% 76.7% 1.4%
Action 3 208 1.9% 6.7% 87.0% 3.8%
Action 4 120 1.7% 2.5% 91.7% 2.5%
Action 5 72 2.8% 4.2% 88.9% 4.2%
Action 6 42 2.4% 2.4% 92.9% 2.4%
Action 7 27 3.7% 3.7% 92.6% 0.0%
Action 8 17 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 5 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 232 office actions
All years 1.9% 35 of 1,860 office actions
Change -1.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.9%
2.3%
0.6%
1.2%
3.1%
1.4%
2014: Alice
1.7%
0.0%
1.2%
4.9%
6.8%
2019: PEG
2.4%
6.9%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
2024: AI examples
1.5%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 30, 2016 11/724,646 Reversed §103
Sep. 22, 2016 13/139,454 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 13, 2016 12/505,825 Reversed §103
Jun. 13, 2014 11/126,504 Affirmed §103
Jan. 27, 2014 10/197,747 Affirmed in part §103
Jul. 29, 2013 10/631,947 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.