Examiner Nishant B Divecha

Grant ratio: 51.7% (23rd percentile in Art Unit 2466 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.23. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 51.7%
Average office actions / grant 3.23
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84822
Primary art unit
2466
Work group
2460
Technology center
2400
Applications
302
Granted applications
156
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3125
Supervisor
Deborah J. Reynolds
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0734

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 56.7% 2.32
Group 225 60.1% 2.07
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.93 941 office actions across 321 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 321 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 59 18.4%
2 OAs 120 37.4%
3 OAs 30 9.3%
4 OAs 68 21.2%
5+ OAs 44 13.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 0.0% 2007 2008: 22.2% 2008 2009: 42.1% 2009 2010: 56.7% 2010 2011: 63.0% 2011 2012: 73.3% 2012 2017: 33.3% 2017 2018: 0.0% 2018 2019: 60.0% 2019 2020: 39.3% 2020 2021: 66.7% 2021 2022: 73.1% 2022 2023: 55.8% 2023 2024: 56.5% 2024 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007100.0%
20089222.2%
2009381642.1%
2010301756.7%
2011271763.0%
2012151173.3%
20173133.3%
2018100.0%
20195360.0%
2020281139.3%
2021332266.7%
2022261973.1%
2023432455.8%
2024231356.5%
2025400.0%
20261600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 321 0.3% 6.9% 90.3% 1.2%
Action 2 262 1.5% 2.7% 91.6% 3.4%
Action 3 142 0.7% 0.7% 97.2% 1.4%
Action 4 112 0.0% 0.0% 98.2% 0.9%
Action 5 44 0.0% 0.0% 95.5% 4.5%
Action 6 29 3.4% 0.0% 89.7% 6.9%
Action 7 16 0.0% 0.0% 93.8% 6.3%
Action 8 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.0% 3 of 147 office actions
All years 0.7% 7 of 941 office actions
Change +1.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
1.5%
2024: AI examples
1.8%
2025: August memo
6.3%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 3/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 29, 2025 16/916,580 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Sep. 22, 2023 16/481,825 Reversed §103
May. 8, 2023 16/475,451 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Aug. 17, 2021 15/762,159 Reversed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.