Examiner Anez Ebrahim

Grant ratio: 74.8% (39th percentile in Art Unit 2467 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.13. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 74.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.13
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85701
Primary art unit
2467
Work group
2460
Technology center
2400
Applications
812
Granted applications
607
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7153
Supervisor
Wing Chan
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7493

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 66.7% 1.98
Group 225 60.1% 2.07
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.16 1,751 office actions across 812 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 808 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.5%
1 OA 362 44.6%
2 OAs 226 27.8%
3 OAs 90 11.1%
4 OAs 68 8.4%
5+ OAs 62 7.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 51.9% 2009 2010: 55.6% 2010 2011: 73.0% 2011 2012: 75.5% 2012 2013: 77.3% 2013 2014: 82.5% 2014 2015: 82.5% 2015 2016: 80.4% 2016 2017: 80.8% 2017 2018: 79.6% 2018 2019: 83.3% 2019 2020: 86.0% 2020 2021: 88.6% 2021 2022: 97.9% 2022 2023: 94.4% 2023 2024: 95.7% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2009271451.9%
2010271555.6%
2011372773.0%
2012493775.5%
2013443477.3%
2014403382.5%
2015403382.5%
2016564580.4%
2017524280.8%
2018493979.6%
2019544583.3%
2020433786.0%
2021443988.6%
2022484797.9%
2023545194.4%
2024474595.7%
2025482450.0%
20265300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 808 0.9% 6.1% 85.5% 3.2%
Action 2 446 0.2% 3.1% 92.4% 2.0%
Action 3 220 0.5% 7.3% 88.2% 2.3%
Action 4 130 0.8% 3.1% 91.5% 3.1%
Action 5 62 0.0% 1.6% 95.2% 0.0%
Action 6 37 0.0% 5.4% 91.9% 0.0%
Action 7 20 0.0% 5.0% 90.0% 0.0%
Action 8 12 0.0% 8.3% 91.7% 0.0%
Action 9 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.9% 5 of 264 office actions
All years 0.6% 10 of 1,751 office actions
Change +1.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
2.0%
1.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
2024: AI examples
1.2%
2025: August memo
1.1%
3.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 1, 2022 14/933,481 Reversed §103
Jan. 24, 2019 14/379,827 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 11, 2017 11/899,350 Affirmed §101 · §103
Mar. 6, 2017 13/945,847 Affirmed §103
Nov. 7, 2016 13/243,357 Affirmed in part §103
Jun. 26, 2015 11/825,351 Affirmed in part N/A
Dec. 16, 2014 11/930,715 Affirmed §103
Dec. 9, 2014 10/569,780 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.