Examiner Andrew Chriss

Grant ratio: 49.1% (26th percentile in Art Unit 2472 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.15. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 49.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.15
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83643
Primary art unit
2472
Work group
2470
Technology center
2400
Applications
279
Granted applications
137
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1774
Supervisor
Kevin Bates
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3980

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 59.9% 1.72
Group 202 63.7% 1.93
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.15 599 office actions across 279 applications
Applications with office actions 98.6% 275 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 1.4%
1 OA 99 35.5%
2 OAs 92 33.0%
3 OAs 41 14.7%
4 OAs 29 10.4%
5+ OAs 14 5.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 42.9% 2008 2009: 72.5% 2009 2010: 67.4% 2010 2011: 78.4% 2011 2012: 96.4% 2012 2013: 50.0% 2013 2015: 25.0% 2015 2025: 26.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200821942.9%
2009402972.5%
2010432967.4%
2011372978.4%
2012282796.4%
201316850.0%
20154125.0%
202519526.3%
20267100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 275 1.8% 9.8% 73.8% 12.0%
Action 2 176 2.3% 14.8% 64.8% 18.2%
Action 3 84 1.2% 2.4% 76.2% 19.0%
Action 4 43 0.0% 7.0% 86.0% 7.0%
Action 5 14 7.1% 14.3% 78.6% 0.0%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.5% 6 of 173 office actions
All years 1.8% 11 of 599 office actions
Change +1.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

3.3%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
2.5%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
5.4%
2.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
27.3% 3/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
36.4% 4/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 28, 2015 12/024,159 Reversed N/A
May. 6, 2015 10/505,227 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 16, 2014 11/590,019 Affirmed §103
Dec. 31, 2013 11/163,544 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jun. 28, 2013 11/590,120 Reversed N/A
Jun. 17, 2013 11/163,545 Affirmed in part N/A
Sep. 21, 2012 10/753,546 Affirmed §103
Sep. 10, 2012 11/116,008 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jun. 26, 2012 10/732,529 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 22, 2012 10/853,422 Affirmed §103 · §112
Feb. 17, 2011 10/648,277 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.