Examiner Jeffrey M. Rutkowski

Grant ratio: 68.1% (28th percentile in Art Unit 2473 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.35. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 68.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.35
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83681
Primary art unit
2473
Work group
2470
Technology center
2400
Applications
310
Granted applications
211
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1215
Supervisor
James Kramer
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6783

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 65.9% 1.96
Group 202 63.7% 1.93
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.18 676 office actions across 310 applications
Applications with office actions 96.5% 299 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 11 3.5%
1 OA 129 41.6%
2 OAs 71 22.9%
3 OAs 44 14.2%
4 OAs 28 9.0%
5+ OAs 27 8.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 58.7% 2008 2009: 70.0% 2009 2010: 71.4% 2010 2011: 82.6% 2011 2012: 82.5% 2012 2013: 85.7% 2013 2014: 50.0% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2017: 0.0% 2017 2024: 85.7% 2024 2025: 25.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008633758.7%
2009402870.0%
2010564071.4%
2011463882.6%
2012403382.5%
2013211885.7%
2014201050.0%
2015400.0%
2017400.0%
20247685.7%
20254125.0%
2026500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 299 0.7% 2.7% 84.9% 11.4%
Action 2 170 2.9% 1.2% 81.8% 13.5%
Action 3 99 0.0% 1.0% 87.9% 11.1%
Action 4 55 0.0% 0.0% 94.5% 5.5%
Action 5 27 0.0% 0.0% 92.6% 7.4%
Action 6 17 0.0% 5.9% 94.1% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 19 office actions
All years 1.0% 7 of 676 office actions
Change -1.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.6%
2.3%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 25, 2016 11/849,508 Reversed §103
Jun. 10, 2015 11/051,354 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 26, 2014 11/170,077 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.