Examiner Hoang-Chuong Q Vu

Grant ratio: 71.0% (43rd percentile in Art Unit 2476 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.52. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 71.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.52
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84724
Primary art unit
2476
Work group
2470
Technology center
2400
Applications
666
Granted applications
473
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3945
Supervisor
Ayaz Sheikh
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3795

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 69.9% 1.98
Group 202 63.7% 1.93
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.54 1,694 office actions across 666 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 666 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 262 39.3%
2 OAs 163 24.5%
3 OAs 81 12.2%
4 OAs 64 9.6%
5+ OAs 96 14.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 50.0% 2007 2008: 35.0% 2008 2009: 43.5% 2009 2010: 46.7% 2010 2011: 67.9% 2011 2012: 56.3% 2012 2013: 82.9% 2013 2014: 78.6% 2014 2015: 71.8% 2015 2016: 80.5% 2016 2017: 70.5% 2017 2018: 71.9% 2018 2019: 76.7% 2019 2020: 87.2% 2020 2021: 94.9% 2021 2022: 86.5% 2022 2023: 91.2% 2023 2024: 91.5% 2024 2025: 41.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20072150.0%
200820735.0%
2009231043.5%
2010301446.7%
2011281967.9%
201216956.3%
2013413482.9%
2014423378.6%
2015392871.8%
2016413380.5%
2017443170.5%
2018322371.9%
2019433376.7%
2020474187.2%
2021393794.9%
2022373286.5%
2023343191.2%
2024474391.5%
2025341441.2%
20262700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 666 1.8% 18.6% 64.7% 8.4%
Action 2 404 2.0% 12.9% 72.0% 9.9%
Action 3 241 0.8% 5.8% 83.4% 7.5%
Action 4 160 1.9% 5.6% 79.4% 11.9%
Action 5 96 1.0% 7.3% 85.4% 6.3%
Action 6 55 0.0% 5.5% 81.8% 12.7%
Action 7 34 0.0% 2.9% 88.2% 8.8%
Action 8 19 0.0% 0.0% 89.5% 10.5%
Action 9 14 7.1% 0.0% 78.6% 14.3%
Action 10 4 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 200 office actions
All years 1.6% 27 of 1,694 office actions
Change -1.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
0.9%
4.6%
2.6%
2.4%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.1%
1.2%
3.2%
1.3%
2019: PEG
3.4%
0.0%
1.3%
1.4%
1.1%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 18, 2018 12/495,395 Affirmed §102 · §103
Aug. 22, 2018 12/480,456 Reversed §103
Aug. 24, 2016 12/953,356 Affirmed in part §103
Apr. 21, 2016 12/833,188 Affirmed §103
Sep. 23, 2015 12/495,383 Affirmed N/A
May. 23, 2014 12/207,166 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.