Examiner Faiyazkhan Ghafoerkhan

Grant ratio: 78.4% (66th percentile in Art Unit 2476 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.75. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 78.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.75
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85598
Primary art unit
2476
Work group
2470
Technology center
2400
Applications
597
Granted applications
468
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7161
Supervisor
Ayaz R Sheikh
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3795

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 69.9% 1.98
Group 202 63.7% 1.93
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.72 1,025 office actions across 597 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 597 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 377 63.1%
2 OAs 120 20.1%
3 OAs 48 8.0%
4 OAs 24 4.0%
5+ OAs 28 4.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 52.9% 2009 2010: 56.3% 2010 2011: 77.8% 2011 2012: 68.0% 2012 2013: 81.3% 2013 2014: 81.8% 2014 2015: 91.3% 2015 2016: 83.3% 2016 2017: 75.0% 2017 2018: 91.3% 2018 2019: 94.9% 2019 2020: 97.4% 2020 2021: 95.1% 2021 2022: 94.7% 2022 2023: 93.8% 2023 2024: 91.3% 2024 2025: 57.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008100.0%
200917952.9%
201016956.3%
2011272177.8%
2012251768.0%
2013322681.3%
2014221881.8%
2015232191.3%
2016302583.3%
2017362775.0%
2018232191.3%
2019393794.9%
2020383797.4%
2021413995.1%
2022575494.7%
2023484593.8%
2024464291.3%
2025352057.1%
20264100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 597 0.8% 24.6% 58.6% 9.2%
Action 2 220 0.0% 10.0% 83.2% 5.0%
Action 3 100 0.0% 9.0% 90.0% 1.0%
Action 4 52 1.9% 7.7% 88.5% 1.9%
Action 5 28 3.6% 3.6% 89.3% 3.6%
Action 6 16 0.0% 0.0% 93.8% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 16.7% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.6% 1 of 165 office actions
All years 0.7% 7 of 1,025 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
2.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.4%
0.0%
2.0%
1.6%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 29, 2021 15/643,085 Reversed §103
Oct. 17, 2018 14/197,071 Reversed §103
Mar. 31, 2015 11/354,212 Reversed N/A
Jul. 11, 2014 12/078,700 Affirmed N/A
May. 8, 2014 12/137,820 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.