Examiner Peter Chau

Grant ratio: 70.1% (34th percentile in Art Unit 2476 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.57. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 70.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.57
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85603
Primary art unit
2476
Work group
2470
Technology center
2400
Applications
613
Granted applications
430
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7152
Supervisor
Ayaz Sheikh
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3795

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 69.9% 1.98
Group 202 63.7% 1.93
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.48 1,519 office actions across 613 applications
Applications with office actions 97.9% 600 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 13 2.1%
1 OA 189 30.8%
2 OAs 179 29.2%
3 OAs 89 14.5%
4 OAs 81 13.2%
5+ OAs 62 10.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 66.7% 2008 2009: 37.5% 2009 2010: 58.6% 2010 2011: 85.3% 2011 2012: 80.0% 2012 2013: 65.8% 2013 2014: 75.0% 2014 2015: 78.8% 2015 2016: 86.8% 2016 2017: 75.6% 2017 2018: 83.3% 2018 2019: 71.9% 2019 2020: 81.0% 2020 2021: 91.5% 2021 2022: 78.9% 2022 2023: 93.8% 2023 2024: 73.7% 2024 2025: 40.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20083266.7%
200924937.5%
2010291758.6%
2011342985.3%
2012252080.0%
2013382565.8%
2014282175.0%
2015332678.8%
2016383386.8%
2017413175.6%
2018363083.3%
2019322371.9%
2020423481.0%
2021474391.5%
2022383078.9%
2023323093.8%
2024191473.7%
2025321340.6%
20264200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 600 4.2% 0.8% 59.3% 33.5%
Action 2 411 1.9% 0.5% 57.9% 38.7%
Action 3 232 0.4% 0.9% 62.5% 35.8%
Action 4 143 0.7% 0.7% 58.7% 39.2%
Action 5 62 3.2% 0.0% 62.9% 32.3%
Action 6 40 2.5% 0.0% 50.0% 45.0%
Action 7 20 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 60.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 28.6% 71.4%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 66.7%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.5% 3 of 206 office actions
All years 2.5% 38 of 1,519 office actions
Change -1.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
5.7%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
1.3%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2.4%
3.7%
9.7%
4.0%
2019: PEG
1.1%
3.9%
2.6%
0.0%
4.1%
2024: AI examples
1.9%
2025: August memo
1.3%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 21, 2017 13/633,667 Reversed §103
Feb. 27, 2017 14/274,040 Affirmed §103
Jan. 11, 2017 12/976,200 Affirmed §103
Jan. 29, 2016 13/211,616 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.