Examiner Joshua Kading

Grant ratio: 73.0% (65th percentile in Art Unit 2479 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.46. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 73.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.46
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80005
Primary art unit
2479
Work group
2470
Technology center
2400
Applications
426
Granted applications
311
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3413
Supervisor
Eileen Lillis
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6928

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 46.8% 1.93
Group 202 63.7% 1.93
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.50 1,085 office actions across 434 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 434 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 149 34.3%
2 OAs 129 29.7%
3 OAs 48 11.1%
4 OAs 55 12.7%
5+ OAs 53 12.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 100.0% 2009 2011: 100.0% 2011 2012: 75.0% 2012 2013: 71.4% 2013 2014: 66.7% 2014 2015: 72.5% 2015 2016: 82.4% 2016 2017: 70.7% 2017 2018: 66.7% 2018 2019: 81.5% 2019 2020: 85.7% 2020 2021: 89.3% 2021 2022: 85.7% 2022 2023: 85.7% 2023 2024: 33.3% 2024 2025: 41.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200911100.0%
201111100.0%
20124375.0%
2013352571.4%
2014211466.7%
2015402972.5%
2016342882.4%
2017412970.7%
2018392666.7%
2019544481.5%
2020423685.7%
2021282589.3%
2022423685.7%
20237685.7%
20243133.3%
202517741.2%
20261700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 434 0.9% 8.3% 64.5% 10.8%
Action 2 285 0.4% 6.0% 77.5% 7.7%
Action 3 156 0.0% 4.5% 77.6% 12.2%
Action 4 108 0.0% 5.6% 85.2% 5.6%
Action 5 53 0.0% 1.9% 77.4% 13.2%
Action 6 29 0.0% 3.4% 93.1% 3.4%
Action 7 11 0.0% 0.0% 81.8% 18.2%
Action 8 7 0.0% 14.3% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Action 13 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.8% 1 of 55 office actions
All years 0.5% 5 of 1,085 office actions
Change +1.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
3.8%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
5.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 16, 2023 16/601,754 Reversed §101 · §103
Aug. 14, 2019 14/581,387 Affirmed §102 · §103
Mar. 8, 2019 14/503,601 Affirmed §103
Oct. 27, 2016 13/101,643 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jul. 26, 2016 13/056,644 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jul. 25, 2016 13/256,586 Reversed §102 · §103
May. 27, 2014 11/678,940 Affirmed §101 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.