Examiner Jose Perez

Grant ratio: 45.3% (42nd percentile in Art Unit 2479 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.77. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 45.3%
Average office actions / grant 3.77
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89426
Primary art unit
2479
Work group
2470
Technology center
2400
Applications
254
Granted applications
115
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7348
Supervisor
Michael Thier
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2832

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 46.8% 1.93
Group 202 63.7% 1.93
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.64 924 office actions across 254 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 254 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 43 16.9%
2 OAs 59 23.2%
3 OAs 32 12.6%
4 OAs 48 18.9%
5+ OAs 72 28.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 0.0% 2011 2012: 100.0% 2012 2013: 84.2% 2013 2014: 36.8% 2014 2015: 38.9% 2015 2016: 62.5% 2016 2017: 54.5% 2017 2018: 50.0% 2018 2019: 45.8% 2019 2020: 47.1% 2020 2021: 50.0% 2021 2022: 70.0% 2022 2023: 50.0% 2023 2024: 53.3% 2024 2025: 22.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011100.0%
201211100.0%
2013191684.2%
201419736.8%
201518738.9%
2016241562.5%
201711654.5%
2018261350.0%
2019241145.8%
202017847.1%
20216350.0%
202210770.0%
2023221150.0%
202415853.3%
20259222.2%
20263200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 254 0.0% 6.7% 91.3% 2.0%
Action 2 211 0.0% 2.4% 96.7% 0.5%
Action 3 152 0.0% 3.9% 94.1% 2.0%
Action 4 120 0.0% 3.3% 96.7% 0.0%
Action 5 72 0.0% 2.8% 91.7% 4.2%
Action 6 48 0.0% 2.1% 95.8% 2.1%
Action 7 26 0.0% 3.8% 96.2% 0.0%
Action 8 18 0.0% 0.0% 94.4% 0.0%
Action 9 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 149 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 924 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 23, 2025 16/010,153 Affirmed §102 · §103
Feb. 15, 2019 13/984,063 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jul. 29, 2016 13/076,646 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.