Examiner Sharif E Ullah

Grant ratio: 76.0% (69th percentile in Art Unit 2495 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.76.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 76.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.76
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78716
Primary art unit
2495
Work group
2490
Technology center
2400
Applications
492
Granted applications
374
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5453
Supervisor
Farid Homayounmehr
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3739

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 63.8% 2.09
Group 202 60.0% 2.06
Tech Center 1,771 57.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.78 878 office actions across 493 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 493 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 257 52.1%
2 OAs 136 27.6%
3 OAs 66 13.4%
4 OAs 22 4.5%
5+ OAs 12 2.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 75.9% 2013 2014: 77.8% 2014 2015: 80.8% 2015 2016: 76.5% 2016 2017: 76.7% 2017 2018: 89.1% 2018 2019: 87.1% 2019 2020: 92.7% 2020 2021: 91.2% 2021 2022: 79.1% 2022 2023: 89.7% 2023 2024: 85.7% 2024 2025: 54.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2013292275.9%
2014362877.8%
2015262180.8%
2016171376.5%
2017302376.7%
2018464189.1%
2019312787.1%
2020413892.7%
2021343191.2%
2022433479.1%
2023393589.7%
2024494285.7%
2025351954.3%
20263600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 493 16.6% 11.0% 6.3% 14.0%
Action 2 236 5.5% 7.2% 10.2% 4.2%
Action 3 100 2.0% 6.0% 12.0% 5.0%
Action 4 34 0.0% 5.9% 20.6% 14.7%
Action 5 12 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0%
Action 6 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 9.8% 18 of 183 office actions
All years 11.0% 97 of 878 office actions
Change -1.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
14.1%
2014: Alice
17.8%
10.4%
9.8%
27.9%
13.7%
2019: PEG
4.9%
0.0%
3.8%
3.4%
16.4%
2024: AI examples
15.6%
2025: August memo
3.6%
8.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
27.3% 3/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
63.6% 7/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 11, 2022 14/884,709 Affirmed in part §103
Dec. 14, 2021 13/686,688 Affirmed in part §101 · §103 · §112
Jul. 24, 2020 14/911,079 Affirmed §103 · §112
May. 11, 2018 14/318,462 Affirmed §103
Jan. 30, 2018 13/332,199 Affirmed in part §103
Dec. 21, 2017 13/935,378 Reversed §103
Mar. 7, 2017 14/017,909 Reversed §103
Mar. 7, 2017 13/940,339 Reversed §103
Feb. 23, 2017 13/936,190 Affirmed in part §103
Nov. 3, 2016 13/381,456 Affirmed §102
Feb. 23, 2016 13/420,102 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.