AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Gita Faramarzi

Examiner Gita Faramarzi appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 36.2%, they average 2.81 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.81
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
15 years (2012-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-0248
Predicted Supervisor
Jorge L. Ortiz-Criado
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-7624
Tech Center
2400 - Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security
Group
2490 - Cryptography and Cybersecurity

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
116
Granted Applications
42
Non-Granted Applications
74
Avg OA / Grant
2.81
Last OA Observed
June 2026 (1 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2439 , 2496 , 2498
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 36.2% 2.81
Art Unit 15 44.0% 2.25
Group 198 61.8% 2.06
Tech Center 1,748 59.1% 2.14
USPTO 16,347 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012 2013 2014 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2012; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2012 1 1 100.0%
2013 14 12 85.7%
2014 9 8 88.9%
No observed data for 2015-2021.
2022 3 1 33.3%
2023 23 11 47.8%
2024 20 8 40.0%
2025 14 1 7.1%
2026 32 0 0.0%

42 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 117 1.7% 0.9% 95.7% 0.9%
2 94 2.1% 1.1% 93.6% 2.1%
3 71 1.4% 1.4% 97.2% 0.0%
4 53 1.9% 0.0% 98.1% 0.0%
5 26 0.0% 0.0% 96.2% 3.8%
6 12 0.0% 8.3% 91.7% 0.0%
7 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 0.0%
8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2012
3.4%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
3.6%
2024
4.3%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.