Examiner John B. King

Grant ratio: 75.2% (59th percentile in Art Unit 2498 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.30. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 75.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.30
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85597
Primary art unit
2498
Work group
2490
Technology center
2400
Applications
625
Granted applications
470
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7310

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 63.3% 1.90
Group 198 61.4% 2.06
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.18 1,362 office actions across 625 applications
Applications with office actions 95.4% 596 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 29 4.6%
1 OA 272 43.5%
2 OAs 136 21.8%
3 OAs 78 12.5%
4 OAs 49 7.8%
5+ OAs 61 9.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 28.6% 2008 2009: 45.5% 2009 2010: 47.8% 2010 2011: 79.4% 2011 2012: 76.5% 2012 2013: 67.6% 2013 2014: 71.8% 2014 2015: 69.7% 2015 2016: 73.3% 2016 2017: 88.5% 2017 2018: 79.6% 2018 2019: 87.2% 2019 2020: 88.6% 2020 2021: 97.1% 2021 2022: 86.2% 2022 2023: 100.0% 2023 2024: 90.6% 2024 2025: 51.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20087228.6%
2009221045.5%
2010231147.8%
2011342779.4%
2012342676.5%
2013342367.6%
2014392871.8%
2015332369.7%
2016453373.3%
2017524688.5%
2018493979.6%
2019393487.2%
2020353188.6%
2021343397.1%
2022292586.2%
20233333100.0%
2024322990.6%
2025331751.5%
20261800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 596 4.5% 5.7% 80.4% 5.5%
Action 2 324 1.9% 3.1% 90.4% 4.0%
Action 3 188 1.1% 0.5% 94.7% 2.7%
Action 4 110 0.0% 0.0% 98.2% 1.8%
Action 5 61 0.0% 1.6% 95.1% 1.6%
Action 6 34 0.0% 0.0% 88.2% 0.0%
Action 7 19 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 9 0.0% 11.1% 77.8% 11.1%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 8.7% 12 of 138 office actions
All years 2.6% 35 of 1,362 office actions
Change +6.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
3.8%
2.7%
7.5%
8.1%
2019: PEG
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
1.9%
2.0%
2024: AI examples
4.3%
2025: August memo
10.4%
20.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 12, 2020 15/232,280 Affirmed §101 · §103
Mar. 29, 2019 11/554,842 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Jan. 23, 2019 14/016,022 Affirmed §103
Jun. 8, 2015 11/441,949 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.