Examiner Edny Labbees

Grant ratio: 59.9% (40th percentile in Art Unit 2612 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.40. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2015
Grant ratio 59.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.40
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81452
Primary art unit
2612
Work group
2610
Technology center
2600
Applications
369
Granted applications
221

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 45 52.0% 1.75
Group 291 49.1% 1.92
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.20 811 office actions across 369 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 369 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 143 38.8%
2 OAs 122 33.1%
3 OAs 43 11.7%
4 OAs 39 10.6%
5+ OAs 22 6.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 54.7% 2008 2009: 50.8% 2009 2010: 70.8% 2010 2011: 61.8% 2011 2012: 55.8% 2012 2013: 64.2% 2013 2014: 58.3% 2014 2015: 100.0% 2015

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008532954.7%
2009633250.8%
2010654670.8%
2011553461.8%
2012432455.8%
2013533464.2%
2014362158.3%
201511100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 369 0.3% 3.3% 93.0% 0.5%
Action 2 226 1.3% 3.5% 92.0% 0.4%
Action 3 104 0.0% 1.9% 94.2% 2.9%
Action 4 61 0.0% 0.0% 93.4% 6.6%
Action 5 22 0.0% 4.5% 86.4% 9.1%
Action 6 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 12.5%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.5% 4 of 811 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.8%
0.9%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 13. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
23.1% 3/13 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
46.2% 6/13 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 9, 2015 12/487,074 Affirmed §103
Sep. 11, 2014 12/059,424 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 26, 2014 11/905,624 Affirmed in part §103
Feb. 28, 2014 11/298,843 Affirmed §103 · §112
Feb. 19, 2014 10/528,731 Reversed §103
Sep. 19, 2013 11/739,708 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 18, 2013 10/479,394 Affirmed N/A
May. 31, 2013 11/738,626 Affirmed §102 · §103
Sep. 27, 2012 12/236,208 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Aug. 30, 2012 11/634,663 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jul. 31, 2012 11/144,883 Reversed §103
Mar. 26, 2012 11/502,039 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.