Examiner Phi Hoang

Grant ratio: 76.0% (86th percentile in Art Unit 2613 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.03. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 76.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.03
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84034
Primary art unit
2613
Work group
2610
Technology center
2600
Applications
966
Granted applications
734
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3417
Supervisor
Jason Chan
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3022

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 48.1% 1.81
Group 291 49.1% 1.92
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.05 1,977 office actions across 966 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 963 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.3%
1 OA 490 50.7%
2 OAs 239 24.7%
3 OAs 103 10.7%
4 OAs 59 6.1%
5+ OAs 72 7.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 0.0% 2007 2008: 45.0% 2008 2009: 36.4% 2009 2010: 63.0% 2010 2011: 71.1% 2011 2012: 81.1% 2012 2013: 77.4% 2013 2014: 81.8% 2014 2015: 78.4% 2015 2016: 84.4% 2016 2017: 83.6% 2017 2018: 83.6% 2018 2019: 86.4% 2019 2020: 96.8% 2020 2021: 88.7% 2021 2022: 90.0% 2022 2023: 86.9% 2023 2024: 85.2% 2024 2025: 44.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007300.0%
200820945.0%
2009331236.4%
2010271763.0%
2011453271.1%
2012534381.1%
2013624877.4%
2014554581.8%
2015372978.4%
2016453884.4%
2017615183.6%
2018615183.6%
2019665786.4%
2020626096.8%
2021625588.7%
2022706390.0%
2023615386.9%
2024615285.2%
2025431944.2%
20263900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 963 4.4% 3.9% 75.7% 6.1%
Action 2 473 1.9% 2.5% 86.7% 3.8%
Action 3 234 0.9% 0.4% 93.6% 3.8%
Action 4 131 0.0% 0.0% 95.4% 3.8%
Action 5 72 1.4% 0.0% 97.2% 1.4%
Action 6 44 0.0% 0.0% 97.7% 2.3%
Action 7 24 0.0% 4.2% 95.8% 0.0%
Action 8 14 7.1% 0.0% 92.9% 0.0%
Action 9 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 4.5% 10 of 222 office actions
All years 2.8% 55 of 1,977 office actions
Change +1.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
0.7%
1.4%
0.7%
1.9%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.2%
2.3%
5.4%
3.8%
2019: PEG
2.1%
6.3%
3.9%
2.1%
12.0%
2024: AI examples
3.8%
2025: August memo
6.5%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 16. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
37.5% 6/16 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
56.3% 9/16 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.6 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 16, 2025 17/209,542 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Oct. 30, 2019 14/942,391 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jul. 31, 2018 13/785,622 Reversed §103
Dec. 20, 2016 12/253,834 Affirmed §103
Nov. 28, 2016 13/592,256 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 28, 2016 11/963,765 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 20, 2016 12/006,702 Affirmed §103
Mar. 10, 2016 13/106,372 Affirmed §103
Feb. 29, 2016 12/845,624 Affirmed §103
Sep. 28, 2015 12/098,240 Reversed N/A
Feb. 19, 2015 12/940,099 Reversed N/A
Sep. 30, 2014 11/953,238 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.