Examiner Mohammad H. Akhavannik

Grant ratio: 69.8% (58th percentile in Art Unit 2613 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.55. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: August 2018
Grant ratio 69.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.55
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89397
Primary art unit
2613
Work group
2610
Technology center
2600
Applications
205
Granted applications
143

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 48.1% 1.81
Group 291 49.1% 1.92
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.37 542 office actions across 229 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 229 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 94 41.0%
2 OAs 56 24.5%
3 OAs 21 9.2%
4 OAs 40 17.5%
5+ OAs 18 7.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 62.5% 2012 2013: 56.5% 2013 2014: 52.5% 2014 2015: 76.6% 2015 2016: 76.9% 2016 2017: 75.8% 2017 2018: 82.1% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20128562.5%
2013231356.5%
2014402152.5%
2015473676.6%
2016262076.9%
2017332575.8%
2018282382.1%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 229 0.0% 21.4% 68.6% 1.7%
Action 2 135 0.0% 17.8% 77.8% 0.7%
Action 3 79 0.0% 8.9% 88.6% 0.0%
Action 4 58 0.0% 3.4% 93.1% 1.7%
Action 5 18 0.0% 5.6% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 6 16 0.0% 6.3% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 542 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
87.5% 7/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 20, 2018 13/284,623 Reversed §103
Mar. 7, 2018 13/493,194 Reversed §102 · §103
Dec. 20, 2017 12/748,420 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Oct. 21, 2016 13/239,598 Affirmed in part N/A
Sep. 20, 2016 13/242,129 Reversed §102
Jul. 27, 2016 13/347,145 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
May. 27, 2016 13/109,763 Reversed N/A
Mar. 14, 2016 12/938,394 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.