Examiner Sarah Le

Grant ratio: 58.7% (27th percentile in Art Unit 2619 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.81. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 58.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.81
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88707
Primary art unit
2619
Work group
2610
Technology center
2600
Applications
288
Granted applications
169
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7842
Supervisor
Kent Chang
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7667

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 69.0% 1.84
Group 291 49.1% 1.92
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.78 800 office actions across 288 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 288 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 85 29.5%
2 OAs 73 25.3%
3 OAs 54 18.8%
4 OAs 28 9.7%
5+ OAs 48 16.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 25.0% 2012 2013: 36.8% 2013 2014: 71.4% 2014 2015: 62.5% 2015 2016: 60.9% 2016 2017: 66.7% 2017 2018: 63.6% 2018 2019: 76.2% 2019 2020: 64.7% 2020 2021: 76.5% 2021 2022: 76.2% 2022 2023: 68.4% 2023 2024: 70.0% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20124125.0%
201319736.8%
2014211571.4%
2015241562.5%
2016231460.9%
201712866.7%
2018221463.6%
2019211676.2%
2020171164.7%
2021171376.5%
2022211676.2%
2023191368.4%
2024201470.0%
2025241250.0%
20262400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 288 1.4% 2.1% 92.0% 2.4%
Action 2 203 0.5% 1.0% 96.1% 1.0%
Action 3 130 0.8% 0.0% 94.6% 3.8%
Action 4 76 2.6% 0.0% 96.1% 0.0%
Action 5 48 2.1% 0.0% 95.8% 2.1%
Action 6 24 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.5% 2 of 132 office actions
All years 1.1% 9 of 800 office actions
Change +0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
2.0%
1.4%
2019: PEG
4.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
2.2%
3.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 8, 2023 14/826,671 Affirmed §103
May. 19, 2021 14/830,133 Reversed §103
Oct. 19, 2018 14/257,129 Affirmed §103 · §112
Aug. 3, 2018 14/703,607 Affirmed in part §103
Jul. 19, 2018 13/945,292 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 8, 2018 13/367,617 Affirmed §101 · §103
Nov. 30, 2016 13/251,322 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.