AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Abdul-Samad A Adediran

Examiner Abdul-Samad A Adediran appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 73.3%, they average 1.78 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.78
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
13 years (2014-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-3128
Predicted Supervisor
Amr Awad
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-7764
Tech Center
2600 - Communications
Group
2620 - Selective Visual Display Systems

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
637
Granted Applications
467
Non-Granted Applications
170
Avg OA / Grant
1.78
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2621 , 2626
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 73.3% 1.78
Art Unit 25 45.0% 2.16
Group 280 55.8% 1.99
Tech Center 1,729 59.3% 1.88
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2014; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2014 32 16 50.0%
2015 24 9 37.5%
2016 30 8 26.7%
2017 58 34 58.6%
2018 40 24 60.0%
2019 59 44 74.6%
2020 70 61 87.1%
2021 60 59 98.3%
2022 76 71 93.4%
2023 70 62 88.6%
2024 49 48 98.0%
2025 51 31 60.8%
2026 18 0 0.0%

467 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 637 1.1% 6.8% 46.6% 40.2%
2 283 0.4% 5.3% 80.6% 12.7%
3 130 0.8% 3.1% 87.7% 7.7%
4 93 0.0% 1.1% 93.5% 4.3%
5 49 0.0% 2.0% 95.9% 2.0%
6 32 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
1.1%
2018
0.9%
2019
0.0%
2020
1.4%
2021
1.0%
2022
2.0%
2023
2.7%
2024
1.5%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.