Examiner Jennifer Zubajlo

Grant ratio: 65.4% (46th percentile in Art Unit 2623 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.11. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 65.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.11
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83125
Primary art unit
2623
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
602
Granted applications
394
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1551
Supervisor
Ke Xiao
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7776

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 14 64.4% 1.99
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.13 1,281 office actions across 602 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 602 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 279 46.3%
2 OAs 166 27.6%
3 OAs 62 10.3%
4 OAs 49 8.1%
5+ OAs 46 7.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 61.1% 2008 2009: 29.4% 2009 2010: 63.0% 2010 2011: 50.0% 2011 2012: 73.7% 2012 2013: 67.6% 2013 2014: 69.4% 2014 2015: 55.9% 2015 2016: 76.5% 2016 2017: 88.2% 2017 2018: 66.7% 2018 2019: 69.7% 2019 2020: 71.8% 2020 2021: 87.5% 2021 2022: 85.7% 2022 2023: 84.8% 2023 2024: 81.3% 2024 2025: 58.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008181161.1%
2009341029.4%
2010271763.0%
2011381950.0%
2012382873.7%
2013342367.6%
2014362569.4%
2015341955.9%
2016342676.5%
2017343088.2%
2018271866.7%
2019332369.7%
2020392871.8%
2021322887.5%
2022211885.7%
2023332884.8%
2024322681.3%
2025291758.6%
20262900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 602 0.3% 2.7% 92.0% 1.2%
Action 2 323 0.3% 0.9% 96.6% 1.2%
Action 3 157 0.0% 0.0% 98.1% 1.3%
Action 4 95 0.0% 1.1% 96.8% 1.1%
Action 5 46 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 25 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 170 office actions
All years 0.2% 3 of 1,281 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
1.3%
1.5%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 20, 2021 15/371,672 Affirmed §103
Jan. 29, 2016 11/965,046 Reversed §103
Apr. 29, 2015 10/911,542 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 14, 2014 11/734,244 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 20, 2012 10/955,514 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.