Examiner Shawna Stepp Jones

Grant ratio: 60.9% (32nd percentile in Art Unit 2623 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.15. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: July 2020
Grant ratio 60.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.15
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87820
Primary art unit
2623
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
271
Granted applications
165

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 14 64.4% 1.99
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.18 667 office actions across 306 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 306 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 126 41.2%
2 OAs 95 31.0%
3 OAs 36 11.8%
4 OAs 25 8.2%
5+ OAs 24 7.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 33.3% 2011 2012: 61.1% 2012 2013: 57.5% 2013 2014: 60.5% 2014 2015: 56.7% 2015 2016: 51.5% 2016 2017: 75.0% 2017 2018: 69.6% 2018 2019: 70.6% 2019 2020: 70.0% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201112433.3%
2012362261.1%
2013402357.5%
2014382360.5%
2015301756.7%
2016331751.5%
2017322475.0%
2018231669.6%
2019171270.6%
202010770.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 306 0.3% 6.5% 85.0% 1.0%
Action 2 180 0.0% 2.8% 93.9% 0.6%
Action 3 85 1.2% 1.2% 92.9% 0.0%
Action 4 49 0.0% 2.0% 98.0% 0.0%
Action 5 24 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 2 of 667 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
2.2%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
55.6% 5/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
77.8% 7/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 18, 2019 14/800,915 Reversed §103
Oct. 10, 2017 13/713,022 Affirmed §103
Nov. 25, 2016 13/534,126 Reversed §103
Jul. 18, 2016 13/405,660 Affirmed §103
Jun. 13, 2016 12/421,705 Affirmed in part §103
Apr. 28, 2016 12/887,243 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Dec. 21, 2015 12/126,807 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A
Sep. 16, 2015 12/250,108 Reversed N/A
May. 7, 2015 12/116,043 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.