Examiner William Lu

Grant ratio: 63.6% (39th percentile in Art Unit 2624 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.30. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 63.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.30
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87776
Primary art unit
2624
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
642
Granted applications
408
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1809
Supervisor
Matthew Eason
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7230

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 34 60.5% 2.04
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.31 1,485 office actions across 642 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 641 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.2%
1 OA 242 37.7%
2 OAs 191 29.8%
3 OAs 82 12.8%
4 OAs 64 10.0%
5+ OAs 62 9.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 0.0% 2011 2012: 43.6% 2012 2013: 53.3% 2013 2014: 56.8% 2014 2015: 54.2% 2015 2016: 62.5% 2016 2017: 75.0% 2017 2018: 78.0% 2018 2019: 80.4% 2019 2020: 68.6% 2020 2021: 79.5% 2021 2022: 85.2% 2022 2023: 77.6% 2023 2024: 86.3% 2024 2025: 47.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20111100.0%
2012391743.6%
2013301653.3%
2014372156.8%
2015241354.2%
2016402562.5%
2017483675.0%
2018413278.0%
2019514180.4%
2020352468.6%
2021393179.5%
2022544685.2%
2023493877.6%
2024514486.3%
2025512447.1%
20264200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 641 0.0% 2.0% 94.9% 0.6%
Action 2 399 0.0% 0.3% 97.5% 1.5%
Action 3 208 0.0% 0.0% 98.1% 1.4%
Action 4 126 0.0% 0.0% 98.4% 0.8%
Action 5 62 0.0% 0.0% 98.4% 1.6%
Action 6 27 0.0% 0.0% 96.3% 0.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 0.0% 90.9% 9.1%
Action 8 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 254 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,485 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 6/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 6/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 5, 2025 16/866,175 Reversed §103
Jul. 30, 2024 16/903,265 Reversed §103
Feb. 12, 2024 17/392,846 Affirmed §103
Jul. 29, 2021 14/634,244 Reversed §103
Apr. 29, 2019 14/125,908 Reversed §103
Dec. 15, 2017 13/765,418 Reversed §103
May. 15, 2017 12/819,887 Reversed §103
Aug. 11, 2015 12/519,130 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 6, 2015 12/335,879 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.