Examiner Joe H Cheng

Grant ratio: 88.5% (98th percentile in Art Unit 2626 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.25. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: December 2025
Grant ratio 88.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.25
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
66317
Primary art unit
2626
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
634
Granted applications
561

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 59.6% 2.20
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.25 790 office actions across 634 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 634 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 526 83.0%
2 OAs 87 13.7%
3 OAs 10 1.6%
4 OAs 4 0.6%
5+ OAs 7 1.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 50.0% 2010 2011: 80.0% 2011 2012: 69.7% 2012 2013: 87.8% 2013 2014: 88.2% 2014 2015: 84.6% 2015 2016: 79.6% 2016 2017: 90.9% 2017 2018: 95.7% 2018 2019: 90.7% 2019 2020: 95.6% 2020 2021: 94.0% 2021 2022: 93.9% 2022 2023: 94.0% 2023 2024: 94.9% 2024 2025: 75.7% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20104250.0%
2011151280.0%
2012332369.7%
2013413687.8%
2014514588.2%
2015262284.6%
2016493979.6%
2017444090.9%
2018474595.7%
2019544990.7%
2020454395.6%
2021504794.0%
2022494693.9%
2023504794.0%
2024393794.9%
2025372875.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 634 1.9% 11.0% 36.4% 30.3%
Action 2 108 0.9% 19.4% 45.4% 16.7%
Action 3 21 0.0% 19.0% 71.4% 9.5%
Action 4 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.0% 2 of 102 office actions
All years 1.6% 13 of 790 office actions
Change +0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
1.9%
1.7%
2019: PEG
1.7%
0.0%
1.7%
5.2%
3.6%
2024: AI examples
2.4%
2025: August memo
2.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
32.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 6, 2013 11/559,474 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.