Examiner Leonid Shapiro

Grant ratio: 54.0% (65th percentile in Art Unit 2629 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.29. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: June 2017
Grant ratio 54.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.29
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79469
Primary art unit
2629
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
739
Granted applications
399

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 43 42.6% 2.03
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.65 1,960 office actions across 739 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 739 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 245 33.2%
2 OAs 189 25.6%
3 OAs 118 16.0%
4 OAs 82 11.1%
5+ OAs 105 14.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 69.9% 2008 2009: 63.9% 2009 2010: 53.6% 2010 2011: 63.2% 2011 2012: 63.5% 2012 2013: 41.7% 2013 2014: 34.4% 2014 2015: 31.6% 2015 2016: 36.6% 2016 2017: 55.6% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20081137969.9%
20091338563.9%
2010844553.6%
2011684363.2%
2012744763.5%
2013964041.7%
2014642234.4%
2015571831.6%
2016411536.6%
20179555.6%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 739 0.1% 8.8% 87.0% 3.4%
Action 2 494 0.4% 6.9% 89.5% 3.0%
Action 3 305 0.0% 4.9% 90.8% 3.9%
Action 4 187 0.0% 3.7% 94.1% 1.6%
Action 5 105 0.0% 4.8% 94.3% 1.0%
Action 6 63 0.0% 1.6% 98.4% 0.0%
Action 7 34 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 18 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.2% 3 of 1,960 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 34. Merits outcomes: 9 affirmed, 9 affirmed in part, and 16 reversed.

Full reversal rate
47.1% 16/34 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
73.5% 25/34 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 23, 2017 13/417,628 Reversed §103
May. 30, 2017 12/948,472 Affirmed §103
Mar. 31, 2017 10/964,427 Affirmed in part N/A
Feb. 28, 2017 11/594,030 Affirmed in part §103
Jan. 27, 2017 12/011,471 Affirmed §103
Oct. 26, 2016 12/019,506 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 28, 2016 11/512,042 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Jul. 8, 2016 12/787,763 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 27, 2016 13/184,802 Affirmed §101 · §103
Mar. 9, 2016 12/400,222 Affirmed in part §102
Dec. 21, 2015 11/934,580 Reversed §103
Sep. 25, 2015 12/335,141 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.