Examiner William L. Boddie

Grant ratio: 17.6% (8th percentile in Art Unit 2629 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 4.03. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 17.6%
Average office actions / grant 4.03
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81320
Primary art unit
2629
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
176
Granted applications
31
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0666
Supervisor
Alford Kindred
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4037

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 43 42.6% 2.03
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.16 565 office actions across 179 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 179 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 43 24.0%
2 OAs 51 28.5%
3 OAs 21 11.7%
4 OAs 26 14.5%
5+ OAs 38 21.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 14.3% 2008 2009: 13.9% 2009 2010: 22.2% 2010 2011: 46.2% 2011 2012: 20.0% 2012 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 100.0% 2014 2015: 40.0% 2015 2016: 50.0% 2016 2017: 8.7% 2017 2021: 0.0% 2021 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200821314.3%
200936513.9%
201027622.2%
201113646.2%
20125120.0%
2013600.0%
201433100.0%
20155240.0%
20166350.0%
20172328.7%
2021600.0%
2025400.0%
20262100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 179 1.1% 4.5% 90.5% 1.1%
Action 2 136 0.0% 4.4% 90.4% 2.9%
Action 3 85 0.0% 5.9% 88.2% 1.2%
Action 4 64 0.0% 1.6% 93.8% 3.1%
Action 5 38 0.0% 5.3% 92.1% 0.0%
Action 6 26 0.0% 3.8% 96.2% 0.0%
Action 7 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 9 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 45 office actions
All years 0.4% 2 of 565 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
8.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 15. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
53.3% 8/15 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 10/15 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.7 months
New grounds of rejection
3
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 3, 2018 12/104,360 Reversed §103
Jul. 30, 2018 13/765,422 Affirmed §103
Mar. 27, 2018 12/948,455 Affirmed §103
Jan. 10, 2018 12/388,443 Reversed §103
Dec. 29, 2017 11/416,407 Reversed §103
Dec. 26, 2017 12/495,483 Affirmed §103
Aug. 23, 2017 12/614,720 Reversed §102 · §103
May. 30, 2017 13/175,581 Reversed §103
Oct. 27, 2015 11/894,721 Reversed N/A
Jun. 23, 2015 11/557,829 Reversed N/A
Oct. 31, 2014 11/240,327 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection N/A
Feb. 26, 2014 11/603,875 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.