Examiner Khanh C. Tran

Grant ratio: 90.0% (91st percentile in Art Unit 2631 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.47. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: December 2025
Grant ratio 90.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.47
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78871
Primary art unit
2631
Work group
2630
Technology center
2600
Applications
1,057
Granted applications
951

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 18 74.6% 1.69
Group 104 68.1% 1.65
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.46 1,553 office actions across 1,061 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,061 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 734 69.2%
2 OAs 226 21.3%
3 OAs 62 5.8%
4 OAs 24 2.3%
5+ OAs 15 1.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 80.6% 2008 2009: 83.0% 2009 2010: 83.8% 2010 2011: 92.1% 2011 2012: 92.6% 2012 2013: 92.9% 2013 2014: 92.7% 2014 2015: 94.0% 2015 2016: 94.6% 2016 2017: 91.8% 2017 2018: 96.2% 2018 2019: 93.8% 2019 2020: 100.0% 2020 2021: 93.5% 2021 2022: 92.9% 2022 2023: 100.0% 2023 2024: 94.7% 2024 2025: 51.5% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008675480.6%
20091008383.0%
2010806783.8%
2011767092.1%
2012958892.6%
2013857992.9%
2014555192.7%
2015504794.0%
2016565394.6%
2017615691.8%
2018525096.2%
2019484593.8%
20204747100.0%
2021464393.5%
2022423992.9%
20232626100.0%
2024383694.7%
2025331751.5%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,061 10.6% 14.5% 54.9% 6.6%
Action 2 327 8.9% 10.4% 59.0% 7.3%
Action 3 101 0.0% 6.9% 68.3% 9.9%
Action 4 39 5.1% 10.3% 53.8% 10.3%
Action 5 15 6.7% 6.7% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 6 7 0.0% 14.3% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 10.1% 10 of 99 office actions
All years 9.3% 144 of 1,553 office actions
Change +0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

11.4%
17.4%
11.5%
7.9%
7.6%
12.7%
2014: Alice
16.2%
9.7%
2.5%
3.8%
4.8%
2019: PEG
6.5%
1.7%
7.4%
2.1%
3.1%
2024: AI examples
8.7%
2025: August memo
12.8%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 28, 2016 13/600,681 Affirmed §103
Sep. 25, 2014 11/956,757 Affirmed §102 · §103
Nov. 6, 2013 11/166,540 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.