Examiner Michael Neff

Grant ratio: 81.4% (72nd percentile in Art Unit 2631 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.69. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 81.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.69
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83530
Primary art unit
2631
Work group
2630
Technology center
2600
Applications
1,014
Granted applications
825
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1848
Supervisor
Hannah S. Wang
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-9018

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 18 74.6% 1.69
Group 104 68.1% 1.65
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.65 1,676 office actions across 1,014 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 1,013 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 657 64.8%
2 OAs 211 20.8%
3 OAs 68 6.7%
4 OAs 36 3.6%
5+ OAs 41 4.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 37.5% 2008 2009: 57.1% 2009 2010: 84.2% 2010 2011: 81.8% 2011 2012: 92.5% 2012 2013: 88.9% 2013 2014: 89.2% 2014 2015: 86.3% 2015 2016: 92.4% 2016 2017: 93.2% 2017 2018: 89.8% 2018 2019: 92.5% 2019 2020: 95.7% 2020 2021: 94.4% 2021 2022: 98.0% 2022 2023: 92.2% 2023 2024: 94.7% 2024 2025: 47.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008481837.5%
2009281657.1%
2010383284.2%
2011443681.8%
2012534992.5%
2013726488.9%
2014655889.2%
2015514486.3%
2016666192.4%
2017595593.2%
2018595389.8%
2019676292.5%
2020474595.7%
2021545194.4%
2022504998.0%
2023514792.2%
2024575494.7%
2025653147.7%
20264000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,013 2.8% 4.5% 68.2% 17.0%
Action 2 356 2.2% 4.5% 81.2% 8.1%
Action 3 145 2.1% 2.8% 89.0% 5.5%
Action 4 77 1.3% 2.6% 94.8% 1.3%
Action 5 41 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 19 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.3% 5 of 215 office actions
All years 2.4% 40 of 1,676 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.8%
1.2%
3.9%
1.6%
1.6%
2.5%
2014: Alice
0.0%
5.4%
4.0%
2.5%
6.5%
2019: PEG
1.3%
1.6%
0.0%
1.6%
3.2%
2024: AI examples
1.4%
2025: August memo
1.3%
4.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 14, 2016 13/142,121 Affirmed §103
Nov. 25, 2014 12/118,804 Reversed §102
May. 30, 2013 10/841,657 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 11, 2013 11/210,929 Reversed N/A
Dec. 12, 2012 11/237,341 Reversed §103
Mar. 23, 2011 10/842,231 Reversed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.