Examiner Michelle M Koeth

Grant ratio: 68.0% (11th percentile in Art Unit 2632 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.10. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 68.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.10
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89185
Primary art unit
2632
Work group
2630
Technology center
2600
Applications
481
Granted applications
327
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5908
Supervisor
Vincent Rudolph
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8243

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 73.9% 1.79
Group 104 68.1% 1.65
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.24 1,076 office actions across 481 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 481 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 166 34.5%
2 OAs 166 34.5%
3 OAs 67 13.9%
4 OAs 56 11.6%
5+ OAs 26 5.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 80.0% 2012 2013: 77.1% 2013 2014: 87.2% 2014 2015: 71.1% 2015 2016: 80.0% 2016 2017: 77.1% 2017 2018: 71.9% 2018 2019: 63.6% 2019 2020: 86.5% 2020 2021: 84.8% 2021 2022: 72.2% 2022 2023: 75.0% 2023 2024: 100.0% 2024 2025: 30.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201210880.0%
2013483777.1%
2014393487.2%
2015453271.1%
2016504080.0%
2017352777.1%
2018322371.9%
2019332163.6%
2020373286.5%
2021332884.8%
2022362672.2%
202312975.0%
202433100.0%
202523730.4%
20264500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 481 1.5% 1.5% 91.1% 4.6%
Action 2 315 0.3% 0.6% 95.6% 2.9%
Action 3 149 0.7% 0.0% 95.3% 3.4%
Action 4 82 0.0% 1.2% 97.6% 1.2%
Action 5 26 0.0% 0.0% 92.3% 11.5%
Action 6 10 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 10.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.7% 4 of 149 office actions
All years 0.8% 9 of 1,076 office actions
Change +1.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.9%
2014: Alice
0.0%
4.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
4.5%
1.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 15, 2022 16/131,968 Affirmed §103
Jul. 19, 2021 15/567,074 Affirmed in part §103
Jun. 17, 2021 15/262,470 Affirmed §103
Dec. 22, 2017 14/838,965 Affirmed §103
Sep. 13, 2016 13/563,036 Affirmed §103
Jul. 28, 2016 13/522,443 Affirmed §103
Jun. 1, 2016 13/483,100 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.