Examiner Linda Wong

Grant ratio: 80.1% (38th percentile in Art Unit 2633 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.04. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 80.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.04
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80676
Primary art unit
2633
Work group
2630
Technology center
2600
Applications
740
Granted applications
593
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6044
Supervisor
Andrew C Flanders
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7516

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 18 76.9% 1.70
Group 104 68.1% 1.65
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.04 1,506 office actions across 740 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 737 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.4%
1 OA 356 48.1%
2 OAs 199 26.9%
3 OAs 75 10.1%
4 OAs 61 8.2%
5+ OAs 46 6.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 62.5% 2008 2009: 61.3% 2009 2010: 77.8% 2010 2011: 71.9% 2011 2012: 77.8% 2012 2013: 96.3% 2013 2014: 84.4% 2014 2015: 87.0% 2015 2016: 91.8% 2016 2017: 94.3% 2017 2018: 91.1% 2018 2019: 86.8% 2019 2020: 81.8% 2020 2021: 97.5% 2021 2022: 88.0% 2022 2023: 77.8% 2023 2024: 93.3% 2024 2025: 58.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008241562.5%
2009311961.3%
2010362877.8%
2011322371.9%
2012362877.8%
2013545296.3%
2014453884.4%
2015464087.0%
2016494591.8%
2017535094.3%
2018565191.1%
2019383386.8%
2020443681.8%
2021403997.5%
2022504488.0%
2023181477.8%
2024151493.3%
2025412458.5%
20263200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 737 2.8% 4.9% 63.1% 5.3%
Action 2 381 2.9% 4.5% 72.2% 4.2%
Action 3 182 1.1% 6.6% 72.0% 3.8%
Action 4 107 1.9% 5.6% 65.4% 6.5%
Action 5 46 0.0% 6.5% 76.1% 2.2%
Action 6 22 0.0% 9.1% 81.8% 4.5%
Action 7 16 0.0% 0.0% 93.8% 0.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 14.3% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.9% 5 of 127 office actions
All years 2.4% 36 of 1,506 office actions
Change +1.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
1.5%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2.5%
3.6%
7.9%
2.5%
2019: PEG
4.2%
2.8%
2.7%
6.8%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
4.8%
4.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 3/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 25, 2021 15/716,730 Reversed §103
Oct. 7, 2021 16/373,335 Reversed §103
Apr. 12, 2021 10/770,342 Affirmed in part §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.