Examiner Sophia Vlahos

Grant ratio: 82.1% (56th percentile in Art Unit 2633 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.93. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 82.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.93
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81171
Primary art unit
2633
Work group
2630
Technology center
2600
Applications
845
Granted applications
694
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5507
Supervisor
Sam K Ahn
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3044

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 18 76.2% 1.70
Group 104 67.5% 1.65
Tech Center 1,763 56.6% 1.88
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.92 1,622 office actions across 845 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 845 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 381 45.1%
2 OAs 275 32.5%
3 OAs 113 13.4%
4 OAs 49 5.8%
5+ OAs 27 3.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 72.0% 2008 2009: 70.0% 2009 2010: 71.4% 2010 2011: 81.3% 2011 2012: 88.5% 2012 2013: 82.0% 2013 2014: 79.6% 2014 2015: 96.6% 2015 2016: 92.3% 2016 2017: 94.7% 2017 2018: 92.3% 2018 2019: 86.4% 2019 2020: 91.4% 2020 2021: 95.3% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022 2023: 95.0% 2023 2024: 87.5% 2024 2025: 56.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008251872.0%
2009503570.0%
2010423071.4%
2011483981.3%
2012524688.5%
2013615082.0%
2014544379.6%
2015585696.6%
2016524892.3%
2017383694.7%
2018524892.3%
2019443886.4%
2020353291.4%
2021434195.3%
20223838100.0%
2023403895.0%
2024403587.5%
2025412356.1%
20263200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 845 1.4% 6.7% 70.5% 18.3%
Action 2 464 0.2% 3.7% 72.8% 18.8%
Action 3 189 0.0% 3.2% 79.4% 15.3%
Action 4 76 0.0% 2.6% 77.6% 15.8%
Action 5 27 0.0% 0.0% 85.2% 14.8%
Action 6 13 7.7% 0.0% 69.2% 23.1%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.6% 1 of 179 office actions
All years 0.9% 14 of 1,622 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2.1%
1.0%
0.8%
0.8%
1.5%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
1.2%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
1.5%
1.5%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
2.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 2, 2021 15/770,989 Affirmed §102 · §103
Oct. 25, 2017 13/869,479 Affirmed §103
Aug. 17, 2015 11/946,062 Reversed N/A
Mar. 28, 2014 12/554,811 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 3, 2013 11/043,025 Affirmed in part §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.