Examiner Khai M. Nguyen

Grant ratio: 82.2% (88th percentile in Art Unit 2641 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.70. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 82.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.70
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80322
Primary art unit
2641
Work group
2640
Technology center
2600
Applications
1,325
Granted applications
1,089
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7923
Supervisor
Charles Appiah
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7904

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 51.7% 2.19
Group 226 57.7% 2.06
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.69 2,235 office actions across 1,325 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 1,324 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 837 63.2%
2 OAs 269 20.3%
3 OAs 107 8.1%
4 OAs 59 4.5%
5+ OAs 52 3.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 23.3% 2008 2009: 51.4% 2009 2010: 82.9% 2010 2011: 93.2% 2011 2012: 92.9% 2012 2013: 91.1% 2013 2014: 92.0% 2014 2015: 94.2% 2015 2016: 84.0% 2016 2017: 90.9% 2017 2018: 87.1% 2018 2019: 94.3% 2019 2020: 95.9% 2020 2021: 91.6% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022 2023: 87.5% 2023 2024: 95.3% 2024 2025: 51.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200830723.3%
2009723751.4%
2010766382.9%
2011444193.2%
2012565292.9%
2013797291.1%
2014756992.0%
2015868194.2%
2016947984.0%
2017777090.9%
2018857487.1%
2019706694.3%
2020737095.9%
2021837691.6%
20227474100.0%
2023726387.5%
2024646195.3%
2025663451.5%
20264900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,324 2.0% 25.5% 52.9% 4.7%
Action 2 487 1.0% 15.6% 71.0% 3.1%
Action 3 218 0.9% 6.4% 83.9% 3.2%
Action 4 111 1.8% 5.4% 82.0% 6.3%
Action 5 52 7.7% 7.7% 69.2% 9.6%
Action 6 24 4.2% 8.3% 70.8% 4.2%
Action 7 11 9.1% 9.1% 72.7% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 25.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.5% 4 of 263 office actions
All years 1.8% 41 of 2,235 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
3.7%
1.0%
3.8%
2.9%
2014: Alice
2.7%
5.9%
0.0%
1.7%
1.9%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.2%
4.1%
1.1%
3.2%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
2.2%
1.7%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 16, 2014 12/132,596 Affirmed §101 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.