Examiner David Orange

Grant ratio: 28.4% (23rd percentile in Art Unit 2641 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.49. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 28.4%
Average office actions / grant 3.49
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91501
Primary art unit
2641
Work group
2640
Technology center
2600
Applications
250
Granted applications
71
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1799
Supervisor
Gregory Morse
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3838

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 51.7% 2.19
Group 226 57.7% 2.06
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.03 796 office actions across 263 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 263 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 67 25.5%
2 OAs 71 27.0%
3 OAs 33 12.5%
4 OAs 46 17.5%
5+ OAs 46 17.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 16.7% 2014 2015: 17.4% 2015 2016: 34.9% 2016 2017: 47.4% 2017 2018: 53.5% 2018 2019: 53.8% 2019 2020: 50.0% 2020 2021: 100.0% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022 2025: 5.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201412216.7%
201523417.4%
2016431534.9%
201719947.4%
2018432353.5%
2019261453.8%
20202150.0%
202111100.0%
202211100.0%
20251915.3%
20266100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 263 1.1% 31.9% 64.6% 2.3%
Action 2 196 1.0% 22.4% 75.5% 1.5%
Action 3 125 0.0% 20.0% 79.2% 0.0%
Action 4 92 1.1% 20.7% 79.3% 1.1%
Action 5 46 0.0% 15.2% 80.4% 4.3%
Action 6 35 0.0% 5.7% 94.3% 0.0%
Action 7 15 0.0% 6.7% 93.3% 0.0%
Action 8 11 0.0% 9.1% 90.9% 0.0%
Action 9 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.2% 5 of 154 office actions
All years 0.8% 6 of 796 office actions
Change +2.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
6.1%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
11.1% 1/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.3 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 20, 2021 13/982,918 Affirmed §102 · §103
Sep. 1, 2021 14/345,691 Affirmed §103 · §112
Feb. 4, 2020 14/345,866 Affirmed §103
Feb. 4, 2020 14/797,418 Affirmed §103
Dec. 9, 2019 14/937,003 Affirmed in part §103
Apr. 4, 2019 14/220,491 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Aug. 29, 2018 14/124,358 Affirmed §101 · §112
May. 22, 2018 14/100,363 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Aug. 23, 2016 12/829,981 Affirmed New ground of rejection §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.