Examiner Joseph Arevalo

Grant ratio: 77.2% (68th percentile in Art Unit 2642 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.15. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 77.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.15
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83830
Primary art unit
2642
Work group
2640
Technology center
2600
Applications
899
Granted applications
694
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3121
Supervisor
Rafael Perez-Gutierrez
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7915

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 49.8% 2.20
Group 227 57.2% 2.06
Tech Center 1,759 56.9% 1.88
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.14 1,920 office actions across 899 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 899 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 372 41.4%
2 OAs 288 32.0%
3 OAs 105 11.7%
4 OAs 72 8.0%
5+ OAs 62 6.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 50.0% 2008 2009: 67.9% 2009 2010: 51.4% 2010 2011: 72.7% 2011 2012: 87.3% 2012 2013: 91.1% 2013 2014: 87.8% 2014 2015: 80.0% 2015 2016: 78.8% 2016 2017: 79.2% 2017 2018: 81.5% 2018 2019: 91.3% 2019 2020: 94.4% 2020 2021: 94.2% 2021 2022: 95.8% 2022 2023: 97.8% 2023 2024: 93.8% 2024 2025: 48.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008201050.0%
2009533667.9%
2010371951.4%
2011554072.7%
2012554887.3%
2013565191.1%
2014413687.8%
2015352880.0%
2016524178.8%
2017483879.2%
2018544481.5%
2019464291.3%
2020545194.4%
2021524994.2%
2022484695.8%
2023464597.8%
2024484593.8%
2025522548.1%
20264700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 899 0.7% 12.3% 68.9% 1.1%
Action 2 527 0.4% 7.6% 79.3% 0.6%
Action 3 239 0.4% 3.8% 84.9% 0.0%
Action 4 134 0.0% 4.5% 84.3% 2.2%
Action 5 62 0.0% 1.6% 90.3% 1.6%
Action 6 31 0.0% 16.1% 74.2% 3.2%
Action 7 15 0.0% 6.7% 93.3% 6.7%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 257 office actions
All years 0.5% 9 of 1,920 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.9%
0.9%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
1.0%
1.1%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
1.2%
2024: AI examples
1.3%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 9, 2021 15/815,106 Reversed §102 · §103
Apr. 29, 2016 13/453,638 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 15, 2016 12/343,501 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 1, 2016 12/072,678 Affirmed in part N/A
Aug. 29, 2014 10/903,931 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.