Examiner David Q. Nguyen

Grant ratio: 88.3% (97th percentile in Art Unit 2643 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.73. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 88.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.73
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79206
Primary art unit
2643
Work group
2640
Technology center
2600
Applications
972
Granted applications
858
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7844
Supervisor
Jinsong Hu
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3965

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 65.0% 2.10
Group 226 57.7% 2.06
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.77 1,716 office actions across 972 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 971 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 550 56.6%
2 OAs 256 26.3%
3 OAs 84 8.6%
4 OAs 43 4.4%
5+ OAs 38 3.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 100.0% 2007 2008: 81.8% 2008 2009: 90.5% 2009 2010: 89.4% 2010 2011: 92.7% 2011 2012: 96.3% 2012 2013: 94.5% 2013 2014: 93.4% 2014 2015: 90.5% 2015 2016: 85.2% 2016 2017: 82.3% 2017 2018: 91.2% 2018 2019: 94.9% 2019 2020: 92.0% 2020 2021: 95.7% 2021 2022: 94.3% 2022 2023: 96.4% 2023 2024: 96.0% 2024 2025: 58.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200711100.0%
2008443681.8%
2009635790.5%
2010665989.4%
2011555192.7%
2012817896.3%
2013736994.5%
2014615793.4%
2015635790.5%
2016544685.2%
2017625182.3%
2018575291.2%
2019595694.9%
2020504692.0%
2021464495.7%
2022353394.3%
2023282796.4%
2024252496.0%
2025241458.3%
20262500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 971 2.8% 30.0% 53.7% 0.9%
Action 2 421 3.1% 24.7% 67.2% 1.2%
Action 3 165 2.4% 15.8% 76.4% 1.2%
Action 4 81 6.2% 12.3% 76.5% 1.2%
Action 5 38 7.9% 18.4% 68.4% 0.0%
Action 6 21 9.5% 19.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 36.4% 45.5% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 50.0% 33.3% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.5% 2 of 137 office actions
All years 3.1% 54 of 1,716 office actions
Change -1.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
3.3%
2.3%
12.5%
5.0%
3.5%
5.1%
2014: Alice
1.9%
0.0%
1.9%
4.5%
1.8%
2019: PEG
1.0%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
4.7%
2024: AI examples
2.2%
2025: August memo
0.0%
3.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 24, 2024 17/099,969 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 23, 2020 14/835,693 Affirmed §103
Jul. 31, 2013 11/344,298 Reversed §102 · §103
Apr. 23, 2012 11/003,113 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.