Examiner Julio Perez

Grant ratio: 75.9% (74th percentile in Art Unit 2644 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.13. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 75.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.13
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80103
Primary art unit
2644
Work group
2640
Technology center
2600
Applications
763
Granted applications
579
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7846
Supervisor
Kathy Wang-Hurst
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5371

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 51.6% 2.18
Group 227 57.2% 2.06
Tech Center 1,759 56.9% 1.88
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.15 1,637 office actions across 763 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 763 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 362 47.4%
2 OAs 186 24.4%
3 OAs 83 10.9%
4 OAs 68 8.9%
5+ OAs 64 8.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 75.0% 2008 2009: 71.1% 2009 2010: 68.4% 2010 2011: 77.8% 2011 2012: 81.1% 2012 2013: 78.8% 2013 2014: 74.4% 2014 2015: 64.0% 2015 2016: 79.7% 2016 2017: 69.2% 2017 2018: 86.8% 2018 2019: 100.0% 2019 2020: 100.0% 2020 2021: 94.3% 2021 2022: 86.5% 2022 2023: 95.2% 2023 2024: 96.7% 2024 2025: 53.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008241875.0%
2009453271.1%
2010382668.4%
2011453577.8%
2012373081.1%
2013524178.8%
2014392974.4%
2015251664.0%
2016594779.7%
2017261869.2%
2018534686.8%
20194444100.0%
20204646100.0%
2021353394.3%
2022373286.5%
2023424095.2%
2024302996.7%
2025321753.1%
20265400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 763 1.4% 17.0% 70.1% 1.8%
Action 2 401 0.2% 10.5% 83.8% 0.7%
Action 3 215 0.5% 4.2% 87.4% 2.3%
Action 4 132 0.8% 3.0% 90.9% 0.8%
Action 5 64 0.0% 1.6% 93.8% 1.6%
Action 6 33 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 15 0.0% 0.0% 93.3% 6.7%
Action 8 5 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.8% 3 of 163 office actions
All years 0.9% 14 of 1,637 office actions
Change +1.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.3%
2.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
7.5%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
6.3%
2025: August memo
0.0%
1.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 27, 2018 14/387,607 Affirmed in part §103
Apr. 6, 2016 12/537,085 Affirmed §103 · §112
Feb. 12, 2016 11/437,152 Reversed §103
May. 29, 2015 11/316,972 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 22, 2014 11/478,435 Affirmed in part N/A
Jan. 3, 2014 11/067,290 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.