Examiner Chuck Huynh

Grant ratio: 64.0% (32nd percentile in Art Unit 2644 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.94. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 64.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.94
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80521
Primary art unit
2644
Work group
2640
Technology center
2600
Applications
528
Granted applications
338
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7866
Supervisor
Kathy Wang-Hurst
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5371

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 51.6% 2.18
Group 227 57.2% 2.06
Tech Center 1,759 56.9% 1.88
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.86 1,510 office actions across 528 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 528 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 181 34.3%
2 OAs 110 20.8%
3 OAs 82 15.5%
4 OAs 59 11.2%
5+ OAs 96 18.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 11.8% 2008 2009: 54.8% 2009 2010: 52.4% 2010 2011: 55.2% 2011 2012: 61.8% 2012 2013: 71.8% 2013 2014: 65.0% 2014 2015: 81.1% 2015 2016: 92.3% 2016 2017: 81.0% 2017 2018: 75.8% 2018 2019: 86.7% 2019 2020: 71.4% 2020 2021: 68.8% 2021 2022: 81.3% 2022 2023: 92.3% 2023 2024: 88.9% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200817211.8%
2009311754.8%
2010211152.4%
2011291655.2%
2012342161.8%
2013392871.8%
2014402665.0%
2015373081.1%
2016393692.3%
2017423481.0%
2018332575.8%
2019302686.7%
2020141071.4%
2021161168.8%
2022161381.3%
2023131292.3%
20249888.9%
2025241250.0%
20264400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 528 1.5% 25.4% 70.1% 0.8%
Action 2 347 0.0% 16.4% 82.4% 0.3%
Action 3 237 0.0% 10.1% 89.0% 0.0%
Action 4 155 0.6% 6.5% 91.6% 0.6%
Action 5 96 1.0% 3.1% 94.8% 0.0%
Action 6 59 0.0% 1.7% 98.3% 0.0%
Action 7 30 0.0% 3.3% 96.7% 0.0%
Action 8 19 0.0% 5.3% 94.7% 0.0%
Action 9 16 0.0% 6.3% 93.8% 0.0%
Action 10 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 166 office actions
All years 0.7% 10 of 1,510 office actions
Change -0.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.8%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2.2%
1.0%
0.9%
2.3%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 8, 2016 12/687,673 Affirmed §103
Dec. 7, 2015 12/687,788 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 6, 2014 11/747,692 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 27, 2014 10/987,915 Reversed N/A
Jul. 17, 2014 10/658,674 Affirmed §103
Mar. 25, 2013 10/919,619 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.