Examiner William D. Cumming

Grant ratio: 84.1% (91st percentile in Art Unit 2645 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.92. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 84.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.92
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
69003
Primary art unit
2645
Work group
2640
Technology center
2600
Applications
1,057
Granted applications
889
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7861
Supervisor
Anthony S. Addy
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7795

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 34 62.4% 2.16
Group 226 57.7% 2.06
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.89 2,003 office actions across 1,057 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,057 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 485 45.9%
2 OAs 357 33.8%
3 OAs 115 10.9%
4 OAs 61 5.8%
5+ OAs 39 3.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 81.6% 2008 2009: 88.7% 2009 2010: 92.1% 2010 2011: 80.7% 2011 2012: 89.1% 2012 2013: 90.0% 2013 2014: 87.0% 2014 2015: 84.8% 2015 2016: 80.7% 2016 2017: 87.9% 2017 2018: 88.1% 2018 2019: 93.8% 2019 2020: 97.0% 2020 2021: 96.6% 2021 2022: 96.0% 2022 2023: 95.1% 2023 2024: 91.2% 2024 2025: 56.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008383181.6%
2009716388.7%
2010635892.1%
2011574680.7%
2012554989.1%
2013605490.0%
2014544787.0%
2015463984.8%
2016574680.7%
2017585187.9%
2018595288.1%
2019484593.8%
2020666497.0%
2021585696.6%
2022504896.0%
2023615895.1%
2024575291.2%
2025533056.6%
20264600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,057 5.0% 11.4% 30.5% 24.2%
Action 2 572 5.8% 20.8% 30.1% 29.5%
Action 3 215 1.4% 16.7% 39.5% 27.4%
Action 4 100 5.0% 13.0% 44.0% 27.0%
Action 5 39 2.6% 10.3% 43.6% 23.1%
Action 6 13 7.7% 7.7% 23.1% 38.5%
Action 7 6 0.0% 16.7% 50.0% 16.7%
Action 8 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.0% 5 of 256 office actions
All years 4.8% 96 of 2,003 office actions
Change -2.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
14.9%
14.2%
5.0%
5.0%
2.8%
3.1%
2014: Alice
3.9%
11.0%
2.7%
1.8%
1.9%
2019: PEG
5.2%
1.8%
1.1%
1.3%
2.7%
2024: AI examples
3.6%
2025: August memo
0.0%
3.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 11, 2020 15/273,115 Affirmed §103 · §112
Feb. 4, 2020 14/687,901 Reversed §102
Dec. 22, 2016 13/039,264 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Nov. 28, 2011 12/099,930 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.