Examiner Dung Lam

Grant ratio: 61.4% (42nd percentile in Art Unit 2646 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.52. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 61.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.52
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80854
Primary art unit
2646
Work group
2640
Technology center
2600
Applications
402
Granted applications
247
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6497
Supervisor
Matthew Anderson
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4177

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 54.6% 2.14
Group 226 57.7% 2.06
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.68 1,079 office actions across 402 applications
Applications with office actions 98.8% 397 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 1.2%
1 OA 144 35.8%
2 OAs 93 23.1%
3 OAs 51 12.7%
4 OAs 52 12.9%
5+ OAs 57 14.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 66.7% 2008 2009: 57.1% 2009 2010: 67.7% 2010 2011: 88.1% 2011 2012: 71.4% 2012 2013: 84.6% 2013 2014: 62.5% 2014 2015: 56.5% 2015 2016: 48.1% 2016 2017: 25.0% 2017 2018: 57.9% 2018 2019: 58.8% 2019 2020: 41.7% 2020 2021: 69.2% 2021 2022: 88.9% 2022 2023: 69.2% 2023 2024: 75.0% 2024 2025: 53.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20089666.7%
2009281657.1%
2010312167.7%
2011423788.1%
2012282071.4%
2013262284.6%
2014241562.5%
2015231356.5%
2016271348.1%
201720525.0%
2018191157.9%
2019171058.8%
202012541.7%
202113969.2%
2022181688.9%
202313969.2%
2024161275.0%
202513753.8%
20262300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 397 0.5% 8.1% 86.1% 0.8%
Action 2 253 0.4% 5.5% 90.9% 0.8%
Action 3 160 0.0% 1.3% 96.9% 0.6%
Action 4 109 0.0% 0.9% 97.2% 0.9%
Action 5 57 0.0% 0.0% 96.5% 1.8%
Action 6 43 0.0% 0.0% 95.3% 0.0%
Action 7 26 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 16 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.5% 3 of 122 office actions
All years 0.3% 3 of 1,079 office actions
Change +2.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.9%
2025: August memo
0.0%
6.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.6 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 7, 2023 14/282,772 Affirmed §103
Feb. 11, 2021 13/985,292 Affirmed §103
Mar. 18, 2020 14/237,771 Reversed §103
Jun. 5, 2019 14/465,025 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Sep. 14, 2015 13/253,265 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 22, 2013 11/174,079 Affirmed §103
Mar. 15, 2012 11/640,582 Affirmed in part §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.