Examiner Phylesha Dabney

Grant ratio: 72.0% (55th percentile in Art Unit 2655 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.07. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 72.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.07
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
76588
Primary art unit
2655
Work group
2650
Technology center
2600
Applications
820
Granted applications
590
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7494
Supervisor
Fan Tsang
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7547

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 60.6% 1.80
Group 210 59.4% 1.87
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.09 1,714 office actions across 820 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 820 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 367 44.8%
2 OAs 239 29.1%
3 OAs 101 12.3%
4 OAs 60 7.3%
5+ OAs 53 6.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 55.6% 2008 2009: 52.9% 2009 2010: 62.2% 2010 2011: 72.1% 2011 2012: 84.2% 2012 2013: 67.3% 2013 2014: 77.3% 2014 2015: 73.8% 2015 2016: 73.9% 2016 2017: 66.7% 2017 2018: 71.1% 2018 2019: 78.8% 2019 2020: 83.0% 2020 2021: 87.0% 2021 2022: 93.0% 2022 2023: 87.8% 2023 2024: 95.7% 2024 2025: 55.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008362055.6%
2009512752.9%
2010372362.2%
2011433172.1%
2012383284.2%
2013493367.3%
2014443477.3%
2015423173.8%
2016463473.9%
2017573866.7%
2018382771.1%
2019524178.8%
2020473983.0%
2021464087.0%
2022434093.0%
2023413687.8%
2024474595.7%
2025341955.9%
20262900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 820 0.7% 32.9% 54.8% 2.2%
Action 2 453 0.0% 24.3% 69.1% 2.2%
Action 3 214 0.0% 20.6% 75.7% 0.5%
Action 4 113 0.0% 20.4% 75.2% 2.7%
Action 5 53 0.0% 11.3% 84.9% 0.0%
Action 6 29 0.0% 6.9% 93.1% 0.0%
Action 7 12 0.0% 8.3% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 16.7% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.6% 1 of 174 office actions
All years 0.4% 6 of 1,714 office actions
Change +0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
2.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
85.7% 6/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 7/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 7, 2019 14/660,275 Reversed §102 · §103
Jan. 30, 2019 14/821,643 Reversed §103
Dec. 20, 2018 14/158,375 Reversed §103
Oct. 17, 2017 13/380,428 Reversed §103
Mar. 17, 2017 11/696,400 Affirmed in part §102 · §112
Dec. 16, 2016 12/955,343 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Nov. 6, 2014 12/378,696 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.