Examiner Abul K. Azad

Grant ratio: 79.4% (93rd percentile in Art Unit 2657 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.48. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 79.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.48
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
76099
Primary art unit
2657
Work group
2650
Technology center
2600
Applications
824
Granted applications
654
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7599
Supervisor
Richemond Dorvil
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7602

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 29 52.4% 1.97
Group 210 59.4% 1.87
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.49 1,230 office actions across 824 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 824 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 549 66.6%
2 OAs 190 23.1%
3 OAs 55 6.7%
4 OAs 18 2.2%
5+ OAs 12 1.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 0.0% 2009 2010: 72.4% 2010 2011: 79.2% 2011 2012: 80.7% 2012 2013: 88.5% 2013 2014: 76.6% 2014 2015: 78.2% 2015 2016: 89.5% 2016 2017: 84.4% 2017 2018: 88.2% 2018 2019: 92.3% 2019 2020: 92.0% 2020 2021: 87.0% 2021 2022: 90.7% 2022 2023: 95.7% 2023 2024: 93.3% 2024 2025: 47.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2009200.0%
2010584272.4%
2011534279.2%
2012574680.7%
2013524688.5%
2014473676.6%
2015554378.2%
2016383489.5%
2017453884.4%
2018514588.2%
2019524892.3%
2020504692.0%
2021464087.0%
2022433990.7%
2023464495.7%
2024454293.3%
2025482347.9%
20263600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 824 4.2% 22.5% 63.5% 0.7%
Action 2 275 8.7% 17.8% 70.9% 0.4%
Action 3 85 8.2% 16.5% 72.9% 0.0%
Action 4 30 20.0% 10.0% 70.0% 0.0%
Action 5 12 8.3% 8.3% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 6 4 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 7.1% 12 of 169 office actions
All years 6.1% 75 of 1,230 office actions
Change +1.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.0%
3.5%
4.3%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.4%
5.2%
18.4%
21.1%
2019: PEG
2.9%
1.4%
6.0%
9.4%
1.8%
2024: AI examples
7.5%
2025: August memo
5.3%
10.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 1, 2024 16/898,887 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Nov. 16, 2020 15/152,380 Reversed §103
Oct. 29, 2020 14/948,471 Affirmed §103
Aug. 27, 2019 14/941,058 Reversed §102
Jul. 30, 2018 14/812,138 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.