Examiner Martin Lerner

Grant ratio: 75.0% (74th percentile in Art Unit 2657 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.08. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 75.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.08
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
76255
Primary art unit
2657
Work group
2650
Technology center
2600
Applications
1,014
Granted applications
761
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7608
Supervisor
Richemond Dorvil
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7602

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 29 51.9% 1.97
Group 210 59.0% 1.87
Tech Center 1,759 56.9% 1.88
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.20 2,229 office actions across 1,014 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 1,013 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 435 42.9%
2 OAs 290 28.6%
3 OAs 118 11.6%
4 OAs 88 8.7%
5+ OAs 82 8.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 87.0% 2008 2009: 73.4% 2009 2010: 81.0% 2010 2011: 74.2% 2011 2012: 76.2% 2012 2013: 73.9% 2013 2014: 75.0% 2014 2015: 85.7% 2015 2016: 80.7% 2016 2017: 77.8% 2017 2018: 70.0% 2018 2019: 92.0% 2019 2020: 80.4% 2020 2021: 80.0% 2021 2022: 78.4% 2022 2023: 75.0% 2023 2024: 78.6% 2024 2025: 48.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008464087.0%
2009644773.4%
2010635181.0%
2011624674.2%
2012634876.2%
2013695173.9%
2014604575.0%
2015494285.7%
2016574680.7%
2017544277.8%
2018604270.0%
2019504692.0%
2020564580.4%
2021504080.0%
2022514078.4%
2023483675.0%
2024423378.6%
2025432148.8%
20262700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,013 11.9% 2.9% 74.5% 5.4%
Action 2 578 9.7% 4.0% 72.0% 11.2%
Action 3 288 8.3% 4.2% 74.7% 10.4%
Action 4 170 5.9% 2.9% 78.2% 12.9%
Action 5 82 7.3% 1.2% 76.8% 14.6%
Action 6 46 4.3% 0.0% 82.6% 13.0%
Action 7 21 0.0% 0.0% 90.5% 9.5%
Action 8 13 7.7% 7.7% 69.2% 15.4%
Action 9 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 25.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.8% 4 of 228 office actions
All years 9.9% 220 of 2,229 office actions
Change -8.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

7.4%
6.3%
18.9%
21.0%
27.3%
23.9%
2014: Alice
16.7%
12.7%
6.6%
8.5%
3.5%
2019: PEG
2.5%
0.8%
0.0%
1.0%
1.1%
2024: AI examples
2.2%
2025: August memo
1.2%
3.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 19, 2021 14/961,693 Reversed §103
Aug. 12, 2020 15/004,344 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 24, 2019 13/948,937 Affirmed §103
Sep. 27, 2017 13/024,536 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Mar. 24, 2017 12/326,901 Affirmed §103
Jun. 21, 2016 12/122,629 Affirmed §103 · §112
Nov. 19, 2015 11/805,166 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 20, 2015 11/364,251 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 30, 2012 11/733,129 Reversed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.