Examiner Daniel M. Pasiewicz

Grant ratio: 70.8% (40th percentile in Art Unit 2661 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.72. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 70.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.72
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81149
Primary art unit
2661
Work group
2660
Technology center
2600
Applications
726
Granted applications
514
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5516
Supervisor
George Eng
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7495

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 34 61.5% 1.61
Group 289 63.2% 1.66
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.80 1,309 office actions across 726 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 724 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.3%
1 OA 380 52.3%
2 OAs 214 29.5%
3 OAs 65 9.0%
4 OAs 37 5.1%
5+ OAs 28 3.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 53.1% 2008 2009: 48.9% 2009 2010: 65.1% 2010 2011: 69.8% 2011 2012: 81.6% 2012 2013: 78.4% 2013 2014: 63.8% 2014 2015: 86.2% 2015 2016: 82.9% 2016 2017: 82.1% 2017 2018: 87.9% 2018 2019: 88.6% 2019 2020: 89.7% 2020 2021: 91.4% 2021 2022: 80.6% 2022 2023: 75.0% 2023 2024: 78.3% 2024 2025: 44.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008321753.1%
2009472348.9%
2010432865.1%
2011533769.8%
2012494081.6%
2013372978.4%
2014473063.8%
2015292586.2%
2016413482.9%
2017393282.1%
2018332987.9%
2019443988.6%
2020393589.7%
2021353291.4%
2022362980.6%
2023241875.0%
2024231878.3%
2025431944.2%
20263200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 724 1.7% 26.2% 61.3% 1.7%
Action 2 344 0.0% 16.0% 74.1% 2.3%
Action 3 130 0.8% 20.0% 68.5% 3.1%
Action 4 65 0.0% 18.5% 73.8% 4.6%
Action 5 28 0.0% 14.3% 82.1% 0.0%
Action 6 13 0.0% 7.7% 92.3% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.9% 3 of 155 office actions
All years 1.0% 13 of 1,309 office actions
Change +0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
2.5%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
3.5%
1.6%
2.1%
6.5%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
2.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 2/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
30.0% 3/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 8, 2022 15/790,430 Affirmed §112
Apr. 2, 2021 15/135,749 Reversed §102
Jan. 7, 2015 11/547,973 Reversed N/A
May. 29, 2014 11/861,970 Affirmed §103
Feb. 10, 2014 10/639,288 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 30, 2013 11/811,100 Affirmed §103
Aug. 30, 2013 11/497,452 Affirmed §103
Jan. 3, 2013 10/988,205 Affirmed §103
Dec. 27, 2012 10/419,984 Affirmed §103
Jan. 24, 2011 10/063,172 Affirmed in part §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.